Someone can help me to find a counterexemple that the following proposition is not true:
$$\left | f \right |\in \mathcal{R}([a,b])\implies f\in \mathcal{R}([a,b])$$
Thank you so much for your help!
Someone can help me to find a counterexemple that the following proposition is not true:
$$\left | f \right |\in \mathcal{R}([a,b])\implies f\in \mathcal{R}([a,b])$$
Thank you so much for your help!
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Take $f(x)=\left\{\begin{matrix} 1 & x\in\mathbb{Q}\\ -1 & x\notin \mathbb{Q} \end{matrix}\right.$
Can you see why it works?