Consider the following situation.
There are multiple options to choose from based on an attribute related to those options. For example:
option attribute
A 30
B 20
Whichever has the highest value for the attribute gets chosen. But a random term is introduced from the normal distribution and added to the attribute.
If for example we use N(0, 7.75), we get a probability of around
10% that the random term is less than -10. So there's a probability of around 10% that the attribute value for A is less than 20.
But we also add the random term for B, so there's a probability of around 50% that the random term is positive and thus the attribute value for B is 20 or more.
In this situation we would get that the probability for A to get chosen rationally based on the original attribute values is 10% * 50% = 5%.
Taking into account that the same can also happen the other way, so that B gets a random term of 10 or more and A gets a random term that is 0 or negative, we also have a 5% probability for B to get chosen irrationally like this.
My question is:
Would I be correct to say that the decision-making here is rational 90% of the time?
You're not doing this well.
I think that A~N(30,7.75) and B~N(20,7.75). Let C = A - B. Find the distribution of C. Irrational choice is P(C<0).