Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $A$ be an ideal of $\Gamma(X, O_X)$. I am wondering what does it mean by $Q$ is the $O_X$ ideal generated by $A$? Also how does one show that ideal sheaf defined in such a way is quasi-coherent? Thank you.
2026-03-25 19:10:49.1774465849
defining an ideal sheaf of a scheme
301 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Related Questions in QUASICOHERENT-SHEAVES
- Why is every sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{X}$-modules not generated by global sections?
- Free module after tensoring with a flat local ring
- On the support of sheaf of modules or quasi-coherent sheaves over ringed spaces
- QCQS lemma for modules?
- Gaga and quasicoherent sheaf
- Counter-examples for quasi-coherent, coherent, locally free and invertible sheaves
- $f_* f^* \mathcal{G}= \mathcal{G}$ and $f^* f_* \mathcal{F}= \mathcal{F}$ for Quasicoherent Sheaves
- Why are the noetherian objects in a category of quasicoherent sheaves just the coherent ones?
- Is this exact: $0\to\mathcal{O}^{hol}\to\mathcal{O}(p)\to \Bbb{C}_p,$
- Quasicoherent sheaves on the groupoid of vector bundles on a surface
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose $A$ is generated by $\{f_i\}_{i\in I}$ as an ideal of $\Gamma(X,O_X)=R$. Then we can define a map $O_X^{\oplus I}\to O_X$ by multiplying the $i^{th}$ coordinate by $f_i$ and summing. The (sheaf) image of this map is $Q$, the requested sheaf of ideals.
In order to show that this is quasicoherent, consider the corresponding map of rings $R^{\oplus I}\to A$. This has a kernel $K$, and we can choose generators for $K$ as an $R$-module which gives us a map $R^{\oplus J}\to K$. Taking the composite, we get a map $R^{\oplus J}\to R^{\oplus I}\to A$ which demonstrates that $A$ is the cokernel of a map of free modules. Using the same map on $O_X^{\oplus J}\to O_X^{\oplus I}\to Q$, we see that $Q$ is again (globally) a cokernel of free modules and thus quasicoherent.
In response to the request for additional clarification:
For any open set $U\subset X$, the restriction homomorphism $res_U:R=O_X(X)\to O_X(U)$ makes $O_X(U)$ in to an $R$-algebra, and thus $O_X^{\oplus I}(U)$ and $O_X^{\oplus J}(U)$ are both $R$-algebras in a natural way. In particular, this means that the maps $O_X^{\oplus J}(U)\to O_X^{\oplus I}(U)$ and $O_X^{\oplus I}\to O_X(U)$ given by $res_U$ applied to the entries of the matrix of the map $R^{\oplus J}\to R^{\oplus I}$ and $R^{\oplus I}\to R$ are also ring homomorphisms, and the fact that the various restriction maps are compatible ring homomorphisms imply that they combine to determine morphisms of sheaves $O_X^{\oplus J}\to O_X^{\oplus I}\to O_X$.
As $Q$ is defined to be the sheaf image of this last map, we get a sequence of maps $O_X^{\oplus J}\to O_X^{\oplus I}\to Q\to 0$, which is exact at $Q$. If we can show that this sequence is exact at $O_X^{\oplus I}$, then we will have verified the definition of $Q$ being quasicoherent (for any point $x\in X$, the open neighborhood is $X$ and the relevant exact sequence is just the same exact sequence we've been talking about above). Showing exactness at $O_X^{\oplus I}$ directly can be a bit of a chore, though - there's a way we can shortcut this rather nicely.
For any scheme $X$, there's a scheme called the affinization of $X$ which is exactly $\operatorname{Spec} O_X(X)$. There's a natural map $X\to \operatorname{Spec} O_X(X)$ coming from the adjunction between global sections and $\operatorname{Spec}$ as functors between rings and schemes (the adjunction means that $\operatorname{Hom}(X,\operatorname{Spec} R) = \operatorname{Hom}(R,\Gamma(X))$ for any scheme $X$ and any ring $R$, so we pick $R=\Gamma(X)$ and take the map on the left side corresponding to $id_R$ on the right side). Let $Y=\operatorname{Spec} R$ be the affinization of $X$. Then as $R^{\oplus J}\to R^{\oplus I} \to A \to 0$ is exact, we get that the corresponding short exact sequence of sheaves on $Y$ given by $O_Y^{\oplus J}\to O_Y^{\oplus I} \to \widetilde{A} \to 0$ is exact, and as pullback is right-exact, the pullback to $X$ of this sequence is precisely $O_X^{\oplus J}\to O_X^{\oplus I}\to Q\to 0$ and this is still exact.