Is there a way to give the regular partial order of the natural number directly from their definition through the Infinity Axiom? I have only ever seen the partial order of the natural number to be defined after the Peano axioms are proved, in which case a natural number $n$ is defined to be less than a natural number $m$ if there exists a non-zero natural number $k$ such that $n + k = m$.
2026-03-26 02:55:38.1774493738
Defining the Order of the Natural Numbers
359 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in ORDER-THEORY
- Some doubt about minimal antichain cover of poset.
- Partially ordered sets that has maximal element but no last element
- Ordered set and minimal element
- Order relation proof ...
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Is the forgetful functor from $\mathbf{Poset}$ to $\mathbf{Set}$ represented by the object 2?
- Comparing orders induced by euclidean function and divisibility in euclidean domain
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
Related Questions in NATURAL-NUMBERS
- Recursive Induction Floor Proof Help
- Countable set example
- Bound a natural by two consecutive powers
- Set theory that proves that if its consistient, is only proves true things about arithmetic
- $n$ is natural number. What is the result of $(-1)^{2n}-(-1)^{4n-1}-1^{n+1}-(-2)^3$
- Given a sufficiently large integer $N$, is it true that there are more primes than perfect squares in $[1,N]$?
- How to show that $(S\cup\{0\},\ge)$ is order-isomorphic to $(S,\ge)$?
- Some questions about the successor function
- What IS the successor function without saying $S(n) = n + 1$?
- Prove addition is commutative using axioms, definitions, and induction
Related Questions in PEANO-AXIOMS
- Difference between provability and truth of Goodstein's theorem
- How Can the Peano Postulates Be Categorical If They Have NonStandard Models?
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Peano Axioms and loops
- Is it true that $0\in 1$?
- Is there a weak set theory that can prove that the natural numbers is a model of PA?
- Exercises and solutions for natural deduction proofs in Robinson and Peano arithmetic
- Proof of Strong Induction Using Well-Ordering Principle
- Some questions about the successor function
- Prove addition is commutative using axioms, definitions, and induction
Related Questions in WELL-ORDERS
- Proof of well-ordering property
- how to prove the well-ordering principle using the principle of complete mathematical induction
- Role of Well-Ordering Principle in proving every subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}$ is of the form $n\mathbb{Z}$
- Is Induction applicable only to well-ordered sets that are not bounded above?
- Application of the Well-Ordering Principle
- Equinumerous well ordered sets are isomorphic
- How can a set be uncountable but well-ordered?
- well ordering principle and ordered field
- Can you turn a well-founded relation into a well-quasi-ordering?
- Initial segment of $\mathbb{Z}$ not determined by an element
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The ordering of the naturals is actually much easier to define if we use the set-theoretic interpretation via the axiom of infinity: the axiom of infinity guarantees the existence of the ordinal $\omega$ - AoI gives us an inductive set, and then Separation applied to this set gives us the smallest inductive set, which is $\omega$ - and natural numbers are just elements of $\omega$. The ordinals are linearly (indeed, well) ordered by "$\in$," and restricted to $\omega$ this gives the usual ordering on the naturals.
Of course, we care about more than just the ordering of the naturals. Addition, multiplication, etc. of natural numbers are then defined recursively - this is tedious but not actually hard.