I am trying to understand the definition of a $\mathfrak{p}$-adic field given in Cassels' Local Fields (Cambridge University Press, 1986, page 144). Here is what he says:
Definition 1.1. Let the field $k$ be complete with respect to the (non-arch.) valuation $|\hspace{0.2cm} |$. We say that $k$ is a $\mathfrak{p}$-adic field if (i) $k$ has characteristic $0$ (ii) $|\hspace{0.2cm} |$ is discrete (iii) the residue class field $\rho$ is finite.
We can give at once an alternative characterization:
Lemma 1.1. The valued field $k$ is a $\mathfrak{p}$-adic field if and only if it is a finite extension of $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$ for some $\mathfrak{p}$.
I believe my confusion arises from the different fonts used for the letter "p." I am not sure what is meant by the usual font used for $p$-adic numbers $\mathbb{Q}_p$ and then the fraktur $\mathfrak{p}$ in the last part of the lemma. What is he trying to convey exactly?
In Lemma $1.1$ the last symbol should be $p$, for a rational prime $p$. The result, which is containing the Lemma is the following:
Proposition: Let $K$ be a valued field of characteristic zero. Then the following statements are equivalent.
$(1)$ $K$ is a local field.
$(2)$ $K$ is a finite extension of $\Bbb Q_p$.
$(3)$ $K$ is complete, locally compact and not discrete.
$(4)$ $K$ is a completion as in Definition $1.1$.
As an example for the notation, if $K$ is a number field, and $\mathcal{O}_K$ its ring of integers, then $\mathfrak{p}$ is a prime ideal in $\mathcal{O}_K$ with residue field $\mathcal{O}_K/\mathfrak{p}$.