We can uniquely define the set of real numbers as a complete ordered field. But can we do something similar with the set of rational numbers ? I think we need to change the completness axiom with some other one. I know that we can define integers in ordered field so maybe this axiom should state that every number is quotient of two integers ? Or maybe we can choose some simpler one. So what axiom/axioms should we choose instead of completness axiom to define rational numbers ? Thanks in advance.
2026-03-25 07:49:15.1774424955
Definition of rational numbers
118 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DEFINITION
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- If a set is open, does it mean that every point is an interior point?
- What does $a^b$ mean in the definition of a cartesian closed category?
- $\lim_{n\to \infty}\sum_{j=0}^{[n/2]} \frac{1}{n} f\left( \frac{j}{n}\right)$
- Definition of "Normal topological space"
- How to verify $(a,b) = (c,d) \implies a = c \wedge b = d$ naively
- Why wolfram alpha assumed $ x>0$ as a domain of definition for $x^x $?
- Showing $x = x' \implies f(x) = f(x')$
- Inferior limit when t decreases to 0
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
Related Questions in RATIONAL-NUMBERS
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- I don't understand why my college algebra book is picking when to multiply factors
- Non-galois real extensions of $\mathbb Q$
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Almost have a group law: $(x,y)*(a,b) = (xa + yb, xb + ya)$ with rational components.
- When are $\alpha$ and $\cos\alpha$ both rational?
- What is the decimal form of 1/299,792,458
- Proving that the sequence $\{\frac{3n+5}{2n+6}\}$ is Cauchy.
- Is this a valid proof? If $a$ and $b$ are rational, $a^b$ is rational.
- What is the identity element for the subgroup $H=\{a+b\sqrt{2}:a,b\in\mathbb{Q},\text{$a$ and $b$ are not both zero}\}$ of the group $\mathbb{R}^*$?
Related Questions in AXIOMS
- Should axioms be seen as "building blocks of definitions"?
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
- Does $\mathbb{R}$ have any axioms?
- Finite axiomatizability of theories in infinitary logic?
- Continuity axioms and completness axioms for real numbers are the same things?
- Why don't we have many non euclidean geometries out there?
- Why do we need the axiom of choice?
- What axioms Gödel is using, if any?
- Determine if U a subspace of $P_3$?
- Why such stark contrast between the approach to the continuum hypothesis in set theory and the approach to the parallel postulate in geometry?
Related Questions in ORDERED-FIELDS
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
- Ordered field with a maximum value
- Can algebraic numbers be compared using only rational arithmetic?
- Completeness of $\Bbb R(x)$?
- Does every ordered divisible abelian group admit an expansion (and how many) to an ordered field?
- Category theory and real closed fields
- Number of orbits of the natural action of order preserving bijections of $\mathbb Q$ on $\mathbb Q^n$
- well ordering principle and ordered field
- If $S<G:=\text{Gal}(E/R)$ is a Sylow 2-subgroup, then $[\text{Fix}_E(S):R] = [G:S]$
- Trouble constructing an ordered set that is not directed
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We can define the field of rational numbers as the smallest ordered field.
More precisely, let $F$ be an ordered field without subfields (except for $F$ itself). Then it is not hard to prove that