so I am studying about graphs from the book discrete maths by Keneth Rosen 7th edition.Pg:645
However, I am bit unsatisifed with one of the statements from the book. So I would like to get it reviewed from someone who knows.

Here the textbook says that in figure 7 there is no multiple directed edges. However I can clearly see there is multiple directed edges between Brian and Yvonne. Is the textbook getting wrong here or I seriously need to look back my concepts? Please help me.

"Multiple edges", in this context, has a technical meaning. (Used informally, it's obviously nonsense, because of course the graph has more than one edge.) It means that edges cannot have multiplicity: the same edge cannot appear multiple times.
It is okay to have the edge $(\text{Brian}, \text{Yvonne})$ as well as the edge $(\text{Yvonne}, \text{Brian})$, because these are different directed edges. However, in this context, it would be meaningless to have two copies of the edge $(\text{Brian}, \text{Yvonne})$: what would it mean, to have Brian "influence Yvonne twice"?
I would not say that an influence graph is a widely-recognized term, so you don't have to worry about its definition in other contexts. However, the term simple directed graph is commonly used for graphs that don't have loops (edges of the form $(u,u)$) or multiple edges (multiple copies of the same edge $(u,v)$). Some sources will also just call this a directed graph and assume by default that it is simple, and say directed multigraph to allow loops and multiple edges.
It is also possible to make other sets of assumptions: