The $p$-logarithm is defined for $|z|<1$ by
$$\text{Li}_p(z)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{z^n}{n^p}$$
and defined elsewhere in $\mathbb C$ by analytic continuation, though it may be multi-valued, depending on the path of continuation.
For an integer $p<0$, the $p$-logarithm is a rational function, whose inverse is an algebraic function, which is multi-valued. For example,
$$\text{Li}_{-1}(z)=\frac{z}{(1-z)^2},\qquad\text{Li}_{-1}^{-1}(z)=\frac{2z+1\pm\sqrt{4z+1}}{2z}.$$
For $p=0$ we have
$$\text{Li}_0(z)=\frac{z}{1-z},\qquad\text{Li}_0^{-1}(z)=\frac{z}{1+z}=-\text{Li}_0(-z),$$
and for $p=1$ we have a form of the ordinary logarithm, whose inverse is an entire function:
$$\text{Li}_1(z)=-\ln(1-z),\qquad\text{Li}_1^{-1}(z)=1-e^{-z}.$$
So, for $p<0$ the $p$-logarithm is single-valued while its inverse is multi-valued, for $p=0$ the $p$-logarithm and its inverse are both single-valued, and for some $p>0$ the $p$-logarithm is multi-valued while its inverse is single-valued.
This isn't much reason to expect the "pattern" to hold for all integers $p>0$. Nevertheless, I'd like to know if it does hold. There's a lot of information on polylogarithms on Wikipedia, but I didn't see any obvious answer to this simple question: Is $\text{Li}_p^{-1}$ single-valued? Equivalently, is $\text{Li}_p$ injective?
("Injective" is usually defined for single-valued functions. Here it means, if $z_1\neq z_2$, then the sets $\text{Li}_p(z_1)$ and $\text{Li}_p(z_2)$ don't intersect.)
We may focus on the case $p=2$.
Let's consider the values of $\text{Li}_2(z)$ near the branch point $z=1$, or equivalently of $\text{Li}_2(1-z)$ near $z=0$, noting that $\text{Li}_2(1)=\pi^2/6$:
$$\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\text{Li}_2(1-z)=\text{Li}_2(z)+\ln(z)\ln(1-z)$$
$$=\left(z+\frac{z^2}{4}+\frac{z^3}{9}+\cdots\right)-\ln(z)\left(z+\frac{z^2}{2}+\frac{z^3}{3}+\cdots\right)$$
(throw away the higher powers of $z$ since $z\approx0$)
$$\approx z-z\ln(z)=z\big(1-\ln(z)\big)$$
(use $\ln(z)\approx-\infty$)
$$\approx z\big({-\ln(z)}\big)=-z\ln(z).$$
Now let $z=e^u$ where $\text{Re}(u)\approx-\infty$, so that $\ln(z)=u$ (as one of the possible values), and
$$\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\text{Li}_2(1-e^u)\approx-ue^u.$$
This latter function is certainly not injective. For any $a\in\mathbb R$, there is a sequence of points $u_k\in\mathbb C$ with $\text{Re}(u_k)<a$, along a curve which is almost a vertical line, all having the same value of $u_ke^{u_k}$, and all having different values of $z_k=e^{u_k}$. I can see this by graphing and analyzing the level curves of $|ue^u|$ and $\arg(ue^u)$: if $u=x+yi$, these curves have the form $y=\pm\sqrt{C^2e^{-2x}-x^2}$ and $x=y\cot(D-y)$, respectively.
Can we use this to prove that $\text{Li}_2$ is not injective? Or is something lost in these approximations? What other methods can we use?
$\text{Li}_2'(z)=\frac{-\log(1-z)}{z}$ doesn't vanish so any curve $\gamma:0\to ?$ along which (the continuation of) $\text{Li}_2(z)$ is analytic gives a curve $\text{Li}_2^{-1}(\gamma):0\to ?$ along which $\text{Li}_2^{-1}$ is analytic.
Next $\text{Li}_2'(z)=\frac{-\log(1-z)}{z}$ shows that $$\text{Li}_2(1-z)=\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\text{Li}_2(z)-\log(z)\log(1-z)$$ for $z\in (0,1)$ and it is meant the principal branch of each term.
Continuing analytically by starting at $1/2$ and rotating one time around $z=0$ we get a new branch
$$\text{Li}_2(1-z)^{new\ branch}=\frac{\pi^2}{6}-\text{Li}_2(z)-(\log(z)+2i\pi)\log(1-z)$$ analytic for $\Im(z)>0,|z|<1$.
This branch has a zero near $0.08+0.18 i$, and since $\text{Li}_2(0)=0$ too it means that $\text{Li}_2^{-1}$ is multivalued, ie. there are some curves $\Gamma:0\to 0$ along which $\text{Li}_2^{-1}$ is analytic but not the same at its departure and arrival.
(it is the argument principle which proves that there is a zero on this plot)