I have been given the primal quadratic program with a single quadratic constraint as given below:
$$ \begin{array}{ll} \min\limits_{x \in \mathbb{R}^n} & \frac12 x^{T} Q x \\ \text{subject to} & \frac12 x^{T} x \leq \frac12 \end{array} $$
where $Q$ is an indefinite, symmetric, rational matrix of size $n$. The task is to show that the optimal values of the primal problem as given and its dual agree. That is, there is no duality gap.
I have (perhaps incorrectly) determined the Lagrangian of this program to be $$L(x,u) = \frac{1}{2}x^{T}Qx+\frac{1}{2}u(x^{T}x-1) = \frac{1}{2}x^{T}(Q+uI)x-\frac{1}{2}u. $$
At this point, after chasing through some circular algebra attempting to solve the dual problem to maximize (over $u$) the infimum (over $x \in \mathbb{R}^n$) of $L(x,u)$ and doing some KKT analysis on the primal problem as given, I can't seem to arrive at the desired result. Further, I understand there is a theorem which says that if there exists a saddle point of the Lagrangian function, then there is no duality gap (Bazaraa, Sherali, and Shetty), yet I can't seem to reconcile any sort of "mathematically tight" guarantee that there exists a saddle point for $L$ (although I have a hunch that there ought to be since $Q$ is indefinite, that is, $Q$ is not PD, not PSD, not ND, not NSD).
If anyone happens to see something particularly insightful in all of this, I would really appreciate the input.
Hint: Your problem is partially addressed in this question
Note that this is one the rare non-convex problems that has a closed form solution and has zero duality gap.