I cannot understand if proof is worded correctly:
Let $x \in (2-\delta, 2+\delta)$. Then we have that $f(x)=5x-3=2+3(x-1)$. Then $f(x) \in (2-3\delta, 2+3\delta)$
Chosing $3\delta = \epsilon$ we see that $f(x) \in (2-\epsilon, 2+\epsilon)$. Thus for $\delta $ such that $0 < |x-1| < \delta$ we have $\epsilon$ such that $0<|f(x)-2|<\epsilon$. So the limit is $2$.
What is wrong with the wording of proof above? I does not understand how to go from $x \in (2-\delta, 2+\delta)$ to $f(x) \in (2-3\delta, 2+3\delta)$. What have I done, is it correct?
Also my book Calculus - Thomas and Finney says that we can choose any $\delta \le \frac{\epsilon}{5}$, but in my case it is $\frac{\epsilon}{3}$
Let $\epsilon>0$.
We need $$|5x-3-2|<\epsilon$$ or $$|x-1|<\frac{\epsilon}{5}.$$
Thus, for all $\epsilon>0$ if $0<|x-1|<\frac{\epsilon}{5}$ then $|5x-3-2|<\epsilon,$
which says that $$\lim_{x\rightarrow1}(5x-3)=2$$ by the definition of the limit.