Can you provide a direct (not based on the neighborhood definition of pretopologies) proof for pretopological spaces (expressed as closure operators) that a function $f$ from a topological space $\mu$ to a topological space $\nu$ is continuous (in the customary topology sense) that is preimage of every open set is open if and only if it is continuous in the pretopology sense that is when $f[\operatorname{cl}_{\mu}A] \subseteq\operatorname{cl}_{\nu} f[A]$ for every subset $A$ of space $\mu$?
2026-04-03 17:01:03.1775235663
Equivalence of pretopological continuity to customary continuity (a direct proof)
109 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in CONTINUITY
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Define in which points function is continuous
- Continuity of composite functions.
- How are these definitions of continuous relations equivalent?
- Show that f(x) = 2a + 3b is continuous where a and b are constants
- continuous surjective function from $n$-sphere to unit interval
- Two Applications of Schwarz Inequality
- Show that $f$ with $f(\overline{x})=0$ is continuous for every $\overline{x}\in[0,1]$.
- Prove $f(x,y)$ is continuous or not continuous.
- proving continuity claims
Related Questions in ALTERNATIVE-PROOF
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- An isomorphism $f:G_1 \to G_2$ maps the identity of $G_1$ to the identity of $G_2$
- Simpler Derivation of $\sin \frac{\pi}{4} = \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
- inequality with arc length integral
- In how many ways can the basketball be passed between four people so that the ball comes back to $A$ after seven passes? (Use recursion)
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
- Clarifying a proof that a certain set is an algebra
- Dilogarithmic fashion: the case $(p,q)=(3,4)$ of $\int_{0}^{1}\frac{\text{Li}_p(x)\,\text{Li}_q(x)}{x^2}\,dx$
- Proof by contrapositive: $x^4 + 2x^2 - 2x \lt 0 \Rightarrow 0 \lt x \lt 1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given topological spaces $X,Y$ and a function $f: X \to Y$, I'll show that the two forms of continuity are equivalent. Note that I'll be using the overline $\overline{\phantom{A}}$ to denote the closure operator in both topological spaces.
Assume that $f : X \to Y$ is continuous "in the customary topological sense". Given $A \subseteq X$, note that $\overline{f[A]}$ is closed in $Y$, so $Y \setminus \overline{f[A]}$ is open in $Y$, and therefore $f^{-1} [ Y \setminus \overline{f[A]}] = X \setminus f^{-1} [ \overline{ f[A] } ]$ is open in $X$. It follows that $f^{-1} [ \overline{ f[A] } ]$ is closed in $X$. Note, too, that $$A \subseteq f^{-1} [ f [ A ] ] \subseteq f^{-1} [ \overline{ f[A] } ],$$ and so it follows that $$\overline{A} \subseteq f^{-1} [ \overline{ f[A] } ].$$ We now have that $$f [ \overline{A} ] \subseteq f [ f^{-1} [ \overline{ f[A] } ] ] \subseteq \overline{f[A]},$$ as desired.
Assume that $f : X \to Y$ is continuous "in the pretopological sense". Given an open $V \subseteq Y$, we want to show that $f^{-1} [ V ]$ is open, or, equivalently that $X \setminus f^{-1} [ V ] = f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ]$ is closed. That is, we want to show that $\overline{ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] } = f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ]$. By properties of closure, we already know that $f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] \subseteq \overline{ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] }$, and so we need only show the reverse inclusion.
By pretopological continuity, $f[ \overline{ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] } ] \subseteq \overline{ f[ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] ] } \subseteq \overline{ Y \setminus V} = Y \setminus V$ (recall that $Y \setminus V$ is closed). Therefore $$f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] \supseteq f^{-1} [ f [ \overline{ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] } ] ] \supseteq \overline{ f^{-1} [ Y \setminus V ] },$$ as desired.
(Note that in the above I am making use of such facts as $f^{-1} [ f [ A ] ] \supseteq A$ and $f [ f^{-1} [ B ] ] \subseteq B$.)