Evaluate $S_n=\frac{1}{\log(2)}+\frac{2}{\log(3)}+\frac{3}{\log(4)}+\frac{4}{\log(5)}+\cdots+\frac{n}{\log(n+1)}$

156 Views Asked by At

Hi I want to evaluate the following sum :

$$S_n=\frac{1}{\log(2)}+\frac{2}{\log(3)}+\frac{3}{\log(4)}+\frac{4}{\log(5)}+\cdots+\frac{n}{\log(n+1)}=?$$

My try :

Using a well know trick we have :

$$\int_{0}^{1}2^x+3^x+\cdots+(n+1)^xdx=S_n$$

Now we see a link between $S$ and the truncated function Zeta .

As I'm stuck now so I propose an crude estimation of the sum $S$:

Since $$\ln(n)\leq n-1$$ for $n\geq 1$ a natural number we have $$n\leq S_n$$

We can do better since $\ln(n)\leq q(n^\frac{1}{q}-1)$ for $n\geq 1$ and $q\geq 1$

An obvious upper bound is :

$$S_n\leq \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$$ for $n\geq 3$

Finally I make the following conjecture :

There is always a prime number between $S_n$ and $S_{n+2}$

My questions

Can someone improve the bound or give a theoretic representation ?

Have you an counter-example ?

Any helps is greatly appreciated..

...Thanks in advance for all your contributions.

Update :

I propose The following conjecture for $n\geq 100$

There is always a prime number between $S_n$ and $S_{n+1}$

Maybe it's stronger than the Firoozbakht's conjecture

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

An upper bound can be given since $$S_n <\int_1^n {x \over \ln(x+1)} dx=li((n+1)^2)-2li(n+1)+li(2)-li(4)$$ In a very similar way you can obtain a lower bound, which is: $$ \int _1^n {{x-1} \over ln(x) } = li(n^2)-li(n)-\ln(2)$$

I don't know if the sum has a closed form.