On page 549 in Dummit and Foote is a proposition which states "Every irreducible polynomial over a finite field is separable. A polynomial in $\mathbb{F}_p[x]$ is separable if and only if it is the product of distinct irreducible polynomials in $\mathbb{F}_p[x]$." However, we know that if the derivative of a polynomial $f(x)$ is $0$, then every root is a multiple root, and so $f(x)$ is not separable. Does this mean, then, that any polynomial in $\mathbb{F}_p$ with derivative $0$ is reducible? The reason I ask is because on the next page, the authors state "If $p(x)$ is an irreducible polynomial which is not separable..." But doesn't the proposition above preclude this?
2026-03-25 11:11:41.1774437101
Every irreducible polynomial over a finite field is separable
4.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Related Questions in FINITE-FIELDS
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- Reciprocal divisibility of equally valued polynomials over a field
- Solving overdetermined linear systems in GF(2)
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
- Field $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)$ with $\alpha=\sqrt[3]7+2i$
- Subfield of a finite field with prime characteristic
- Rank of a Polynomial function over Finite Fields
- Finite fields of order 8 and isomorphism
- Finding bases to GF($2^m$) over GF($2$)
- How to arrange $p-1$ non-zero elements into $A$ groups of $B$ where $p$ is a prime number
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Over $K=\Bbb{F}_p$ it does hold that if, for some $f(x)\in K[x]$, we have $f'(x)=0$, then $f$ is reducible. The reason is the following.
If $f'(x)=0$ this means that all the terms in $f(x)$ have degrees that are multiples of $p$. In other words, $$ f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^na_ix^{pi} $$ for some natural number $n$ and some coefficients $a_i\in\Bbb{F}_p$. Two key results then come to the fore:
Put together these imply that the above polynomial $f(x)$ $$ f(x)=\sum_{i=0}^na_ix^{pi}=\sum_{i=0}^n(a_ix^{i})^p=\left(\sum_{i=0}^na_ix^i\right)^p $$ is actually the $p$th power of a lower degree polynomial, hence reducible.
The same result holds for other fields $K$ of characteristic $p$ as long as all the elements of $K$ are $p$th powers of some element of $K$ (above it would have been enough to have $a_i=b_i^p$ for some $b_i\in K$). Such fields are called perfect, and whenever $K$ is a perfect field we see that irreducible polynomials over $K$ are necessarily separable.
Therefore we can use as the field $K$ any finite field. This is because the Frobenius automorphism $z\mapsto z^p$ is an injective endomorphism of $K$ (trivial kernel). When $K$ is finite "injectivity $\implies$ surjectivity" and we are done.
It doesn't work as nicely for all fields of characteristic $p$. The textbook counterexample is $K=\Bbb{F}_p(t)$. The polynomial $m(T)=T^p-t$ is irreducible (Eisenstein), but it is not separable. It has a single zero $t^{1/p}$ of multiplicity $p$ in an extension field of $K$.