Let $\cal K$ be a $\lambda$-accessible category with directed colimits and $\cal C$ be its representative full subcategory consiting of $\lambda$-presentable objects. Let $\cal L$ be free completion of $\cal C$ under directed colimits.There is a functor $F:$Ind$(\cal C)\to \cal K$ preserving directed colimits. We want to show that this $F$ is faithful. An unclear proof follows. Consider two distinct morphisms $f$,$g$ in Ind$(\cal C)=L$.Why there are morphisms $f',g':A\to B$ in $\cal C$ and morphisms $u:A\to K$ and $v:B\to L$ such that $fu=vf'$ and $gu=vg'$. From now on I do understand. Since $F$ is faithful on $\cal C$ (because it is identity on $\cal C$), $Ff',Fg'$ are distinct.Since $Fv$ is a monomorphism,$Ff,Fg$ are distinct. See also the page 7 here.I also do understand that for any $\lambda$-presentable object $K$ any morphism $h$ from $K\to D$ to a $\lambda$-directed colimit of objects $D_i$, $D$=colim$D_i$, essentially uniquely factorizes through some $D_i$.
2026-02-22 23:08:42.1771801722
Existence of morphisms in a free completion under directed colimits,$\lambda$-accessible category
125 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in LIMITS-COLIMITS
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- What prevents me from starting the cone in the objects mapped by the diagram
- Two morphisms $f, g : M \to L$ are equal as long as they are equal under the limit $L$.
- Separating coproducts by its index set
- Preservation of coproducts by coproducts
- Categorification of commutative sum
- Colimit of a directed system of modules
- Pullback square with two identical sides
- Subring of an inverse limit is the entire thing if maps to pieces are surjective
Related Questions in MONOMORPHISMS
- Monomorphisms, unclear basic property, Functor
- Relation between homomorphisms and monomorphims of finite groups
- Is the unique subobject also mono?
- Epimorphism and monomorphism explained without math?
- Morphism=monomorphism•epimorphism?
- $\lambda$-pure morphisms in $\lambda$-accessible categories are monos, unclear proof
- Investigate whether the given transformation is a monomorphism / epimorphism. Find image and kernel
- Proof verification: An arrow which is monic under a faithful functor is itself monic
- Every $\lambda-$pure morphism in a locally $\lambda-$presentable category is a regular monomorphism
- Are all split epimorphisms effective?
Related Questions in HOM-FUNCTOR
- When can functors fail to be adjoints if their hom sets are bijective?
- Existence of morphisms in a free completion under directed colimits,$\lambda$-accessible category
- Preservation of limits by representable functors
- There is a natural morphism $\lim\limits_{\longleftarrow} \beta \to \lim\limits_{\longleftarrow} \beta \circ \varphi^{op}$?
- Fully faithful nerve ⟹ injective on objects?
- $\operatorname{Hom}$ functor is projective?
- Existence of injective homomorphism
- Isomorphism between Hom-space and $k$
- Is “monoidal category enriched over itself” the same as “closed monoidal category”?
- Does an adjoint of an internal Hom functor of a prounital closed category define a tensor product?
Related Questions in ACCESSIBLE-CATEGORIES
- Morita theory for algebras for a monad $T$
- $\lambda$-pure morphisms in $\lambda$-accessible categories are monos, unclear proof
- $\lambda$-accessible categories, unclear proof
- Is the 2-Category of Groupoids Locally Presentable?
- Question about accessibility of category of free abelian groups.
- Category of accessible functors and its closedness
- Galois types, factorization
- Galois types, factorization 2
- Adjointenes of unknown functors
- How to show the $\kappa$-small functor is $\kappa$-accessible? (coalgebraic logic)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given $f,g\colon K\to L$ you can express $K$ and $L$ as directed colimits $K=\mathrm{colim}_i A_i$ and $L=\mathrm{colim}_j B_j$ with $A_i$ and $B_j$ in $\cal C$. Let $u_i\colon A_i\to K$ and $v_j\colon B_j\to L$ be the maps into the colimits.
(1) First take some $A=A_i$ and $u=u_i\colon A_i\to K$.
(2) Now observe that in $\mathrm{Ind}({\cal C})$ the objects from $\cal C$ are finitely presentable (not just $\lambda$-presentable). Therefore the two composite maps $fu\colon A\to K \to L$ and $gu\colon A\to K \to L$ factor through some $v_j\colon B_j\to L$ and $v_k\colon B_k\to L$.
(3) Because the colimit diagram for $L$ is directed, there is a common upper bound $B_j \rightarrow B_l \leftarrow B_k$. Set $B=B_l$ and $v=v_l$. Then $fu$ and $gu$ both factor through $v\colon B\to L$