Let us suppose the final iteration of the simplex tableau indicates nondegeneracy (no basic variable is at zero level) and the reduced cost of one of the non-basic variables is zero. Are we always guaranteed to have another optimal solution that is distinct from the current optimal solution in this case?
2026-03-26 12:51:33.1774529493
Existence of multiple optimal solutions in Linear Programming simplex method
311 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in LINEAR-PROGRAMMING
- Proving dual convex cone property
- Linear algebra: what is the purpose of passive transformation matrix?
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Show that $ \ x_ 0 \ $ cannot be an optimal solution
- Is there any way to model this situation in integer programming?
- How to Solve a Linear Programming Problem in $n$ Dimension Space?
- How to solve a linear program without any given data?
- Constraints for continuous path within graph with at least one obligatory node in path
- Select the smallest strict positive value from a list of variables in a linear program.
- How to add nonnegative constraint to an LP problem
Related Questions in SIMPLEX-METHOD
- First step of simplex algorithm
- Simplex Method Problem
- Simplex method can't solve assignment problem?
- Simplex Method gives multiple, unbounded solutions but Graphical Method gives unique soution
- Simplex Method - Why is my answer wrong?
- The importance of the full-row-rank assumption for the simplex method
- Big "M" Method and Dual Simplex give me the different answer.
- Why would you choose Simplex over Lagrange/KKT multipliers methods?
- Show that if Phase I of the two-phase method ends with an optimal cost of zero then the reduced cost vector will always take the form $(0, 1)$
- Theta-Ratio of a Simplex Method for a degenerate solution, are they always equal?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, just as long as the initial optimal point is basic feasible, as this is because the optimal solution for that type of model doesn't exist on just a singular point, but on a line with an infinitely amount of points. Let's consider the model:
$$\max\quad z=2000x_1+3000x_2$$ Subject to: $$6x_1+9x_2\le100$$ $$2x_1+x_2\le20$$ $$x_1,x_2\ge0$$
Now let's graphically depict this without the objective function as such:
What we'll find is that when we solve this is that the objective function will envelop the entire line like so:
Simplex is landing at either upper-corner, optimal extreme points in the model, and the non-basic variable that would produce the other optimal solution is the variable that correlates with the opposite optimal point that lives on the optimal line (the non-basic variable with a reduced cost coefficient of zero). In actuality, all points that exist on this line are optimal to this model, thus we can represent optimal lines as such:
$$\lambda(x_1,y_1)+(1-\lambda)(x_2,y_2),\quad\lambda\in[0,1]$$ where points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$ are unique extreme points on either end of the line. Thus, this is why we are always guaranteed to have another optimal feasible point if we pivot in the multi-solution situation if we start pivoting from an already feasible optimal point.