Can one prove the existence of the tensor product by the adjoint functor theorem? (of, say, modules over a commutative ring) If yes, how would one check the SSC (solution set condition) for the hom functor?
2026-04-28 08:31:22.1777365082
Existence proof of the tensor product using the Adjoint functor theorem.
928 Views Asked by user111072 https://math.techqa.club/user/user111072/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in RECREATIONAL-MATHEMATICS
- Good ideas for communicating the joy of mathematics to nine and ten year olds
- Who has built the house of Mason?
- Is there any tri-angle ?
- In what position , the dogs will reside?
- existence of solutions of $a^n+b^n+c^n=6^n$
- Sushi Go! and optimal passing strategy
- Cut the letter $M$ to obtain $9$ single triangles by drawing $3$ straight lines
- Tennis balls problem from John H Conway's "Genius At Play"
- The Heegner Polynomials
- 2018 January Challenge: Prove inequality in geometry problem
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $R$ is a ring, $M$ is a right $R$-module and $N$ is a left $R$-module, then the functor of balanced maps $F : \mathsf{Ab} \to \mathsf{Set}, A \mapsto \{\beta: |M| \times |N| \to |A| \text{ balanced}\}$ satisfies the assumptions of Freyd's criterion for representability: It is easy to check that it preserves limits. For the solution set condition, let $\beta : |M| \times |N| \to |A|$ be a balanced map. Let $A'$ be the subgroup of $A$ which is generated by all elements of the form $\beta(m,n)$ with $m \in M, n \in N$. Then $\# |A'| \leq \aleph_0 \cdot \# |M| \cdot \# |N|$. Hence, up to isomorphism, there is only a set of such $A'$s. This provides the solution set, since $\beta$ factors as a balanced map $|M| \times |N| \to |A'|$ followed by $|A'| \hookrightarrow |A|$.
Hence, $F$ is representable, which means that the tensor product $M \otimes_R N$ exists. In fact, all classical universal constructions of basic algebra can be obtained with Freyd's criterion for representability - without any effort.
Now if $R$ is commutative, then $M \otimes_R N$ is actually an $R$-module which represents the functor of bilinear maps $\mathsf{Mod}(R) \to \mathsf{Set}$ on $|M| \times |N|$. This functor is isomorphic to $\hom_R(M,\underline{\hom}_R(N,-))$, so that in fact $\hom_R(M \otimes_R N,T) \cong \hom_R(M,\underline{\hom}_R(N,T))$, i.e. $- \otimes_R N$ is left adjoint to $\underline{\hom}_R(N,-)$. Now your question was actually how to use Freyd's adjoint functor theorem to obtain $- \otimes_R N$ this way:
Again it is clear that $\underline{\hom}_R(N,-) : \mathsf{Mod}(R) \to \mathsf{Mod}(R)$ preserves limits, so that we only have to verify the solution set condition. But this comes down to the proof above: If $M \to \underline{\hom}_R(N,T)$ is an $R$-linear map, it corresponds to an $R$-bilinear map $|M| \times |N| \to |T|$, hence factors through $|T'|$ for some submodule $T'$ whose cardinality can be bounded depending only on $M,N,R$.