The text am reading says that the following can be seen 'easily':
Suppose $K$ and $F$ are fields. Then $K$ is called an extension of $F$ if $F \subseteq K$. It can be seen 'easily' that $K$ forms a vector space over $F$.
But am rather new to this type of algebra, and I couldn't see the above easily .... Could I have some simple explanations to explain why or perhaps some examples ?
It is easy to verify that $K$ satisfies the axioms for a vector space over $F$, since these axioms are essentially just the field axioms cast in a different context. For example, if
$a \in F \tag 1$
and
$b, c \in K, \tag 2$
then
$a(b + c) = ab + ac, \tag 3$
i.e., multiplication by elements of $F$ distributes over addition in $K$; likewise, with
$a, b \in F \tag 3$
and
$c \in K, \tag 4$
we have
$(ab)c = a(bc), \tag 5$
the usual formulation of the associativity of scalar-vector multiplication; the other vector space axioms are also simple consequences of their field-theoretic counterparts.
A concrete instance may be had by taking
$F = \Bbb Q, \tag 6$
the rationals, and
$K = \Bbb R, \tag 7$
the reals. The reader is undoubtedly familiar with the (obvious) arithmetic in this case.