Problem: Let $f$ be a holomorphic function on a domain $D$ ( let's say a connected open subset of $\mathbb C$) and it is one-one. Show that $f'(z)\ne0$ for all $z\in D$
My approach: Let us suppose $f'(z_0)=0$ for some $z_0\in D$ and also let $f(z_0)=w_0$. Since $f$ is injective $f'$ is not identically zero .
Therefore $\exists r>0$ such that $f(z)\ne w_0$ and $f'(z)\ne 0$ for all $z\in B(z_0,r):=\{z\in D:0<|z-z_0|<r\}$.
We can have a sequence $\{w_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ such that $w_n\to w_0$ and $w_n\ne w_0$ for all $n$
Then let us define $g(z)=f(z)-w_0$ on $B(0,\frac{r}{2})$. And sequence of holomorphic function $\{g_n\}$ on $B(0,\frac{r}{2})$ such that $g_n(z)=f(z)-w_n$.
Observe that $g$ has a zero of order $m\ge2$ at $z_0$.
So $g_n\to g$ uniformly on $B(0,\frac{r}{2})$. Here we are in a position to apply Hurwitz Theorem.
Therefore $\exists n_0$ such that $g_n$ and $g$ have the same number of zeroes on $B(0,\frac{r}{2})$ counted with multiplicity (i.e. $m\ge 2$ here) for all $n\ge{n_0}$.
So $g_{n_0}$ has $m$ zeroes counted with multiplicity. But observe that there are atleast two distinct zeroes of $g_{n_0}$ in $B(0,\frac{r}{2})$ (the zeroes may have different multiplicities).
Otherwise, if we have $g_{n_0}(z_1)=0$ with multiplicity $m\ge 2$ then $g_{n_0}'(z_1)=f'(z_1)=0$, which is not possible as $z_1\in B(0,\frac{r}{2})$.
Let the distinct roots be $z_1$ and $z_2$ then $g_{n_0}(z_1)=g_{n_0}(z_2)=0\implies f(z_1)=f(z_2)=w_{n_0}$ .
This contradicts the fact that $f$ is one-one.
Let me know if it is right. If wrong, provide me with a better approach. If any simple solution exists please let me know.
Thank You.
Suppose $f'(z_0)=0$ for some $z_0\in D$. The holomorphic function $h:D\to \mathbb{C},h(z)=f(z)-f(z_0),$ has a zero in $z_0$ of order 2 or higher. For sufficiently small $\epsilon>0$, there would exist an $\delta>0$ such that for all $a$ with $\mid a-f(z_0)\mid<\delta$ the equation $f(z)=a$ has 2 or more solutions in the disk $\mid z-z_0\mid <\epsilon$, which would contradict the fact that $f$ is one-to-one.
For a proof, see Theorem 11, p. 131, Complex Analysis by Ahlfors.