The correct answer is $(3x-2)(x+2)$ but I am getting $(x-\frac{2}{3})(x+2)$, why?
My calculations: $x = \frac{-4\pm\sqrt{16-(-48)}}{6} = \frac{-4\pm8}{6}$, which gives the factors $(x-\frac{4}{6})(x+\frac{12}{6}) = (x-\frac{2}{3})(x+2)$.
The correct answer is $(3x-2)(x+2)$ but I am getting $(x-\frac{2}{3})(x+2)$, why?
My calculations: $x = \frac{-4\pm\sqrt{16-(-48)}}{6} = \frac{-4\pm8}{6}$, which gives the factors $(x-\frac{4}{6})(x+\frac{12}{6}) = (x-\frac{2}{3})(x+2)$.
On
Because if the roots of $ax^2+bx+c$ are $r_1$ and $r_2$, then$$ax^2+bx+c=a(x-r_1)(x-r_2).$$You forgot the $a$.
In your case, you get:\begin{align}3x^2+4x-4&=3\left(x-\frac23\right)(x+2)\\&=(3x-2)(x+2).\end{align}
On
Suppose $Q(x)$ is some quadratic, including yours (for argument's sake, $Q(x)=ax^2+bx+c$).
Then suppose $Q(t)=0$.
It is then true that the function $\lambda Q(x), \lambda \in \Bbb R$ (so $\lambda Q(x)=a\lambda x^2+b\lambda x+c\lambda$)
has solution $\lambda Q(t)=0$
If we take your factors from the quadratic equation; $(x-\frac23)$ and $(x+2)$, and multiply them, we get $x^2+\frac43 x-\frac43=\frac 13(3x^2+4x-4)$
So we need to multiply this factorisation by $3$, which just means multiplying one of the brackets by $3$.
On
You are confusing factoring a quadratic with solving a quadratic.
The quadratic $ax^2 + bx + c=0$ will have the same solutions as $x^2 + \frac bax + ca = 0$ (in fact, that was the very first step in developing the quadratic formula) and will have the same as $dx^2 + \frac {db}ax + \frac {dc}a-0$ or any $akx^2 + bkx + ck =0$.
And you will get the same two solutions $r_1 = \frac {-b+\sqrt{b^2 -4ac}}{2a}$ and $r_2 = \frac {-b+\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$ for all of those polynomials.
And $x^2 + \frac ba x + \frac ca$ will factor as $(x - r_1)(x - r_2)$. (If we expand $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ we get $x^2 - (r_1+r_2)x + r_1r_2$ and it's not hard to see that $-(r_1 + r_2)= \frac ba$ and $r_1r2 = \frac ca$.)
But that means $ax^2+bx + c = a(x^2 + \frac bax +\frac ca) = a(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ will factor as $a(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$. In general $(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ will expand to a polynomial with leading coefficient $1$. And $k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$ will expand to a polynomial with leading coefficient $k$.
And we want leading coefficient $a=3$. So we need $3x^2 + 4x-4 = 3(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$
Now you figured out $r_1$ and $r_2$ perfectly correctly.
So we have $3x^2 +4x-4 = 3(x-\frac 23)(x+2) = (3x -2)(x+2)$.
....
you know... maybe this will be clearer if we complete the square:
$3x^2 + 4x - 4 =$
$3(x^2 + \frac 43x +\frac {-4}3)=$
$3([x^2 + 2\frac {4}{2*3}x + \frac {4^2}{4*3^2}] - \frac {4^2}{4*3^2}+\frac {-4}3) =$
$3([x+\frac 4{2*3}]^2 - \frac {4^2 -4*(-4)*3}{4*3^2})=$
$3((x+\frac 4{2*3} + \frac {\sqrt{4^2 - 4*(-4)*3}}{2*3})(x+\frac 4{2*3} - \frac {\sqrt{4^2 - 4*(-4)*3}}{2*3}) =$
$3(x- \frac {-4-\sqrt{4^2 -4*(-4)*3}}{2*3})(x-\frac{-4+\sqrt{4^2 -4*(-4)*3}}{2*3})=$.
$3(x-\frac 23)(x+2)= (3x-2)(x+2)$.
Notice how after the first line and until the very last line, the $3$ just hung around for the ride doing absolutely nothing? That's ... kind of the point. The leading coefficient $a$ doesn't really do much once you set up to solve (after all, if you set to $0$, which we didn't do this time, we can just divide it out) but it sticks around if we never actually set anything to zero (which in this case we didn't).
Some other people have been saying you made a mistake, but that isn't quite right, at least not how I'm looking at it. I think the confusion here comes from the fact that the quadratic formula is mainly a tool to help solve quadratic equations, not so much to factor quadratic expressions. You can still use the quadratic formula to factor $ax^2 + bx + c$, but you'll need to do an extra step or two if $a \ne 1$.
In this case, you (correctly) reduced the equation $3x^2 + 4x - 4 = 0$ to the equation $\left(x - \frac23\right)(x+2) = 0$ by using the quadratic formula. What happens now if you multiply both sides of your result by $3$?