Let $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ and $\xi \in \mathbb{R}^n$ with $\xi \sim \mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$ be a random vector from a multivariate normal distribution with zero mean and identity covariance matrix. In a paper I'm reading on chance-constrained optimization, the authors claim that the feasible region of the probabilistic constraint $$\{x \in \mathbb{R}^n : \text{Prob}(\xi^{\text{T}} x \leq 1) \geq 1 - \varepsilon\}$$ is a Euclidean ball centered at the origin of radius
\begin{align} \label{eqn:radius} r &= (1 + o(1))\sqrt{2\log\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)} \tag{1}. \end{align}
as $\varepsilon \to 0$. I would like to derive the above result.
We can rewrite the probabilistic constraint as $$\left\lbrace x \in \mathbb{R}^n : \text{Prob}\left(\xi^{\text{T}} \frac{x}{\left\lVert x\right\rVert} \leq \frac{1}{\left\lVert x\right\rVert}\right) \geq 1 - \varepsilon \right\rbrace$$ to see that the feasible region of this constraint will be a sphere of certain radius (this follows from the fact that we can pick any unit vector $\frac{x}{\left\lVert x\right\rVert}$ because of the spherical symmetry of the distribution of $\xi$), but I don't know how to proceed further to derive \eqref{eqn:radius}.
Since the distribution is spherically symmetrical, just look at one of the axes; in which case, you are essentially trying to find the $r$ that satisfies $P(|\xi r| > 1) < \epsilon$, which is equivalent to $P(|\xi| > \frac{1}{r}) < \epsilon$.
Now, a popular bound in probability called Chernoff bound for gaussian variables (with variance 1) tells you that $P(|\xi| > t) < 2e^{-\frac{t^2}{2}}$. As such, if $2e^{-\frac{1}{2r^2}} < \epsilon$, you are in the feasible region.
Solving it by algebra, you get $r < \sqrt{\frac{2}{\log{\frac{2}{\epsilon}}}}$ (You should check to verify), and this has I think the "right" scaling with epsilon; in the bound you gave in the question, picking epsilon close to 1 seems to shrink your feasible region, whereas it should be expanding (since if epsilon could be 1, any x would be feasible).
I could be wrong though, but since you asked how such bounds are derived, this is one way to approach this problem.