Final object in the "free group" category $\mathscr{F}^A$

216 Views Asked by At

The following excerpts come from the book Algebra: Chapter 0's section II.5 - Free groups. My question is about an easy exercise.

  1. First, to define the free group $F(A)$ on $A$, the author introduces a category $\mathscr{F}^A$ as follows:

    enter image description here

  2. The exercise is 5.1 at the end of the section, which is shown below.

    enter image description here

  3. In the main text, the author proved that free group $F(A)$ on A will be (the group component of) an initial object in $\mathscr{F}^A$. The universal property is stated as follows:

    enter image description here

  4. When $A=\{a\}$ is a singleton. The author find this function $j: \{a\} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ which sends $a$ to $1$, as an qualified initial object.

My attempt is also to consider the simplest situation when $A = \{a\}$. As the following diagram shows:

enter image description here

If $F(A)$ above is a final object, then we can find a set-function $j: A \rightarrow F(A)$ such that for all groups $G$ and set-functions $f: {a} \rightarrow G$ there exists an unique group homomorphism $\varphi: G \rightarrow F(A)$ such that the above diagram commutes.

Because the diagram must commute, I have to force $j(a) = \varphi \circ f(a)$. Because this property holds for all $f$'s, let me make $f(a)=1_G$. Because $\varphi$ is a group homomorphism, I have to force $\varphi(1_G) = \varphi \circ f(a) = 1_{F(A)} = j(a)$.

Then, I find I can't do any 'force' anymore, which means I can find many $\varphi$ satisfying the above requirements. For the specific function $f(a)=1_G$, $\varphi$ is not unique. So there is no such final object.

My question is:

  1. I only proved when $A= \{a\}$ is a singleton, there are no final objects. Is there a situation when $A$ is larger, the case is true?
  2. Maybe there is some generalization behind this exercise? I chose a very special function $f(a)=1_G$. If there is, could someone please indicate to me what kind of generalization it is?