Let $K_0\subseteq F$ be an arbitrary field extension and $K$ be the fixed field of ${\rm Aut}_{K_0}(F)$, where $\mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F):=(K_0)':=\{\sigma\in \mbox{Aut}(F) \,: \sigma|_{K_0}=\mbox{id}_{K_0}\}$ and $K:=(K_0)'':= \{v\in F:f(v)=v,\forall f\in \mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)\}$.
Similarly, we define $K':=\{\sigma\in \mbox{Aut}(F) \,: \sigma|_{K}=\mbox{id}_{K}\}$ and $K'':=\{v\in F:f(v)=v,\forall f\in \mbox{Aut}_{K}(F)\}$.
We say $F$ is Galois over $K$ if $K''=K$, and $F$ is Galois over $K_0$ if $(K_0)''=K_0$.
My book says that,
$F$ is Galois over $K$, $K_0\subseteq K,$ and Aut$_K(F)=\mbox{Aut}_{K_0}F$.
I have difficulty in showing that $F$ is Galois over $K$ and $K_0$.
$\color{darkred}{\mathbf{Edit:}\mbox{ I found the words in the book actually doesn’t mean that }F \mbox{ is Galois over } K_0. “K_0\subseteq K”\mbox{ just simply means } “K_0\subseteq K” …}$
Here is my attempt:
$K\subseteq K''$ is trivial because every $f\in \mbox{Aut}_K(F)$ fixes $K$. Similarly, we have $K_0\subseteq (K_0)''=K$.
Let $v\in K''$. Then $\forall g\in \mbox{Aut}_{K}(F), g(v)=v.$ In order to show $K''\subseteq K$, we need to show that $\forall f\in \mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)$, $f(v)=v.$ Equivalently, we need to show that $\mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)\subseteq \mbox{Aut}_{K}(F)$, which I cannot prove.
So, my question is how to show that $F$ is Galois over $K$ and $K_0$. Thanks for help.
I suddenly understood the logic behind it. It is just a game of words.
Let us prove $\mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)\subseteq \mbox{Aut}_K(F)$.
Let $\varphi \in \mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)$. If we can show that $\varphi$ fixes every point in $K$, then $\varphi \in \mbox{Aut}_K(F)$.
Let $k\in K$. Recall that $K:=(K_0)'':= \{v\in F:f(v)=v,\forall f\in \mbox{Aut}_{K_0}(F)\}$.
Therefore, $\varphi(k)=k$, which implies that $\varphi$ fixes every point in $K$.
By the reasoning I wrote in the OP, we can conclude that $F$ is Galois over $K$.