How can Cartesian tensor methods be used to prove this identity? I tried starting with the continuity equation but can't seem to get anywhere. Thank you in advance for any help.
2026-03-30 05:23:31.1774848211
Fluid dynamics - Proving the Lorentz reciprocal theorem using Cartesian tensor methods
1.7k Views Asked by user429679 https://math.techqa.club/user/user429679/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Related Questions in FLUID-DYNAMICS
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- Partial derivatives and path integrals
- Complex potentials and gradient
- 1D viscous flow upwards against gravity
- Higher order of the convection term approximation
- Show that using Suffix Notation
- Fluid Dynamics Proof
- Conversion of Surface integral to a suitable Volume integral.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

For Stokes flow the velocity $\mathbf{u}$ and stress tensor $\mathbf{T}$ satisfy the continuity equation $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u} = 0$ and momentum equation $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{T} = \mathbf{0}.$ We assume here that the body force is conservative (eg, gravity) and has been absorbed into the isotropic part of the stress tensor.
In terms of Cartesian components, we have
$$\tag{1}\partial_i u_i = 0,$$
and
$$\tag{2} \partial_j T_{ij}=0,$$
where Cartesian components are introduced with the Einstein convention (summation over repeated indexes).
The stress tensor and velocity are related by the constitutive equation
$$\tag{3} T_{ij} = -p \,\delta{ij} + 2 \mu D_{ij},$$
where $p$ is the pressure, $\mu$ is the viscosity, $\delta_{ij} = 1 \, (i = j); \, = 0 \, (i \neq j)$ is the Kronecker delta, and $D_{ij}$ are components of the rate-of strain tensor given by
$$\tag{4} D_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_j u_i + \partial_i u_j).$$
Now suppose we have a second velocity $\mathbf{u}'$ and stress tensor $\mathbf{T}'$ satisfying
$$\tag{1'} \partial_i u_i' = 0,$$ $$ \tag{2'} \partial_j T_{ij}' =0,$$ $$\tag{3'} T_{ij}' = -p' \,\delta{ij} + 2 \mu' D_{ij}',$$ $$\tag{4'} D_{ij}' = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_j u_i' + \partial_i u_j').$$
We assume here that the two flow fields are functions defined on the same domain $V \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ with boundary $S$.
Multiplying $T_{ij}$ by $D_{ij}'$ we obtain
$$T_{ij}D_{ij}' = -p\delta_{ij} D_{ij}' + 2 \mu D_{ij} D_{ij}' = 2 \mu D_{ij} D_{ij}' ,$$
since $\delta_{ij}D_{ij}' = D_{ii}' = \partial_i u_i' = 0$, using the continuity equation $(1')$.
Similarly, interchanging unprimed and primed variables, we have
$$T_{ij}'D_{ij} = 2 \mu' D_{ij}' D_{ij}. $$
Thus,
$$\tag{5}\mu' \, T_{ij} \, D_{ij}' = \mu \, T_{ij}' \, D_{ij}.$$
Since the stress tensor is symmetric, we have $T_{ij} = T_{ji}$, $T_{ij}' = T_{ji}'$ and
$$\tag{6}T_{ij} \, D_{ij}' = \frac{1}{2} T_{ij} \, \partial_j u_i' + \frac{1}{2} T_{ij} \, \partial _i u_j' = T_{ij} \, \partial_j u_i' = \partial_j \, (T_{ij} \, u_i') - u_i' \partial_j \, T_{ij}, \\ T_{ij} \, 'D_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} T_{ij}' \, \partial_j u_i + \frac{1}{2} T_{ij}' \, \partial _i u_j = T_{ij}' \, \partial_j \, u_i = \partial_j \, (T_{ij}' \, u_i) - u_i \, \partial_j T_{ij}'.$$
From equations $(2)$ and $(2')$ we have $\partial_j T_{ij} = \partial_j \, T_{ij}'= 0$ and $(6)$ reduces to
$$\tag{7}T_{ij}\, D_{ij}' = \partial_j \, (T_{ij} \, u_i'), \\ T_{ij}' \, D_{ij} = \partial_j \, (T_{ij}' \, u_i) $$
Substituting the results from $(7)$ into $(5)$ we get
$$ \mu'\partial_j \,(T_{ij} \, u_i') = \mu\partial_j \, (T_{ij}' \,u_i),$$
and in general tensor form
$$\mu' \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{T} \cdot \mathbf{u}') = \mu \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{T}' \cdot \mathbf{u}).$$
Integrating over $V$ we have
$$\mu' \int_V \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{T} \cdot \mathbf{u}') \, dV = \mu \int_V \nabla \cdot (\mathbf{T}' \cdot \mathbf{u}) \, dV$$
Applying the divergence theorem it follows that
$$\mu' \int_S \mathbf{n} \cdot (\mathbf{T} \cdot \mathbf{u}') \, dS = \mu \int_S \mathbf{n} \cdot (\mathbf{T}' \cdot \mathbf{u}) \, dS.$$
Your result is the special case where $\mu = \mu'.$