I want to give all $a\in\mathbb{R}$, for which $f_a: (0,\infty)\to\mathbb{R}$, $f_a(x)=x^a$ is Lipschitz-continuous?
I think, that $f_a$ is only Lipschitz-continuous for $a=0$ and $a=1$, which is trivial.
But what is the best way, to show, that it is not Lipschitz-continuous for every other $a$, using the definition only?
I want to seperate three cases. $a\in (-\infty, 0)$, $a\in (0,1)$ and $a\in (1,\infty)$
For the first case $a\in (-\infty, 0)$ I just observe $(0,1]$. Because, when I can show, that it fails on this interval, $f_a$ can not be Lipschitz.
I have to show, that $\forall L\geq 0\quad\exists x,y\in (0,1]: |f_a(x)-f_a(y)|> L|x-y|$
Without loss of generality, we can take $y=1$ and get $|x^a-1|=x^a-1$, since $x\in (0,1]$.
Also if we can show, that $x^a-1>L$, then $x^a-1> L|x-y|$
This gives us $x^a>L+1\Leftrightarrow x^{-a}<\frac1{L+1}$. Taking the "(-a)th root", leaves us with $x<\sqrt[-a]\frac1{L+1}$.
Now I choose, lets say $x=\sqrt[-a]\frac1{L+2}$ and $y=1$ and conclude the proof.
Would this be sound? Taking the "(-a)th root" feels not that good. Also, can the choice of $x$ depend on $a$ too? I think so, since $a$ is fixed.
Is this correct so far? Thanks in advance.
Your conclusion is right: here's another look:
If we unpack the definition of Lipschitz we'll find that for a function $f$ there must exist $C$ such that $\forall x \neq y$ in the domain we have $$ \Bigg|\frac{f(x)-f(y)}{x-y} \Bigg|\leq C$$ But then we have that the left hand side of this inequality is only a bounded function when we take $f(x)=x^n$, when $x\in 0,1$.
$|\frac{x^n-y^n}{x-y}|\leq C$ but then if we consider $x=y+1$ this becomes
$(y+1)^n-y^n =y^n \bigg( \big(\frac{y+1}{y} \big)^n-1 \bigg)$ and this is unbounded when $n\notin 0,1$.