Is there an easy way to find the Fourier transform of a Laplace transform of function? $$ F[L[f(t)]_{s}] $$ Where my $f(t)$ is $\sqrt{t}$. However, Before finding the Fourier transform I do the substitution $s = (x^{2}+1)$. I am doing this because I wish to find out the convolution of $1/(x^{2}+1)$ with itself, using Fourier identities for convolution. I.e. $$ g(x)\star g(x) = F^{-1}[F[g(x)]\cdot F[g(x)]] $$ Note that my $g(x) = L[\sqrt{t}]_{s}$.
2026-03-28 06:06:51.1774678011
Fourier transform of a Laplace transform
164 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in LAPLACE-TRANSFORM
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- Calculating an inverse Laplace transform
- Laplace Transform working out
- How to solve the integral equation $f(x) = \int_0^x f(x-y)k(x,y)dy+g(x)$ for $f(x)$?
- Laplace Transform for an Initial Value Problem
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Laplace transform for the solution of a system of differential equations with no constant coefficients
- Question about Dirac comb
- Using Laplace transforms to solve a differential equation
- Prove $\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\cos xt}{1+t^2} dt = \frac{\pi}{2}e^{-x}$ by using Laplace Transform
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Convolution sum
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof of Young's inequality $\Vert u \star v \Vert_p \le \Vert u \Vert_1 \Vert v \Vert_p.$
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing the convolution of $f(x)=\gamma1_{(\alpha,\alpha+\beta)}(x)$
- Convolution of distributions property
- Self-convolution of $f(\vec{r}) = e^{-x^2-y^2}/r^2$
- Inverse $z$-transform similar to convolution
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since you mention $\sqrt{t}$ I assume that your original function is defined on $[0,\infty )$. Then the complex Laplace transform is \begin{equation*} L(z)=\int_{0}^{\infty }dt\exp [izt]f(t),\;{Im}z>0. \end{equation*} With $\theta (t)$ the Heaviside step function and setting $z=\omega +i\delta $ we can write \begin{equation*} L(z)=L(\omega +i\delta )=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }dt\exp [i\omega t]\theta (t)\exp [-\delta t]f(t), \end{equation*} so the Laplace transform coincides with the Fourier transform of $\theta (t)\exp [-\delta t]f(t)$.
But why not calculate the convolution directly? We have
\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{x^{2}+1}\ast \frac{1}{x^{2}+1}=\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }dy\frac{1}{% y^{2}+1}\frac{1}{(y-x)^{2}+1} \end{equation*} which can be written as \begin{equation*} \frac{1}{x^{2}+1}\ast \frac{1}{x^{2}+1}=\int_{-\infty }^{+\infty }dy\frac{1}{% y+i}\frac{1}{y-i}\frac{1}{y-x+i}\frac{1}{y-x-i} \end{equation*} Completing the integration interval with a semi-arc in the upper half-plane you now pick up the residues in $y=i$ and $y=x+i.$