Help to resolve this optimization problem with lagrangians? Cheeers!

235 Views Asked by At

enter image description here

So I have this problem, and what I do is to set up the max problem.( for Lambda Ill use the letter "L" and for what it looks like gamma Ill use letter "g" )

Objective function is Bln(x-t) and the constraint is Px=y

I set up the Lagrangian as follows Bln(x-g)+L(y-Px).

I then write the FOC , so derivatives of the Langrangian in respect to x , y and L.

(1) respect to x => ((b)/(x-g))-L*P = 0

(2) respect to y => L =0

(3) respect to L => y-P*x = 0

So I made it up to here, I thinkI have made some mistakes as equation number 2 doesnt really make sense, I had never done an optimization problem with paramters. Any help please?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On BEST ANSWER

Objective function is B*ln(x-t) and the constraint is P*x=y

Either you are ignoring the presence of multiple goods, or are using some vectorized notation. I won't do either, so for me the objective is $$\sum_{i=1}^n \beta_i \ln(x_i-\gamma_i)$$ and the constraint is $$\sum_{i=1}^n p_i x_i = y$$ The Lagrangian is $$L=\sum_{i=1}^n \beta_i \ln(x_i-\gamma_i) + \lambda \left(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i x_i - y \right)$$ By the way, what are we optimizing over? Over amounts $x_i$, I think. The quantity $y$ is not consumer's to choose: of course, if s/he could choose the income to have, the optimization problem becomes pointless: just have yourself a lot of money and buy all you want. This is why taking the derivative with respect to $y$ leads to an absurd equation.

The relevant partial derivatives are those with respect to variables: $x_i$ and the Lagrange multiplier $\lambda$. $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial x_i} = \frac{\beta_i}{x_i-\gamma_i} + \lambda p_i$$ $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \lambda} = \sum_{i=1}^n p_i x_i - y$$ These should be equated to $0$, etc.