If $F$ is a field and $R = F[t_1, t_2, ... t_k]$ and $Y$ is a set of polynomials in $k$ variables over $F$ then by Hilbert's basis theorem apparently $YR = \sum\limits_{i=1}^m f_i R$ for some $f_1,...,f_m ∈ R$, but I don't see why this is? Any help appreciated, thanks!
2026-04-11 23:23:25.1775949805
Hilbert's Basis Theorem question
147 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in FIELD-THEORY
- Square classes of a real closed field
- Question about existence of Galois extension
- Proving addition is associative in $\mathbb{R}$
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible for an infinite field that does not contain a subfield isomorphic to $\Bbb Q$?
- Proving that the fraction field of a $k[x,y]/(f)$ is isomorphic to $k(t)$
- Finding a generator of GF(16)*
- Operator notation for arbitrary fields
- Studying the $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ when $p(x)$ is any degree.
- Proof of normal basis theorem for finite fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Hilbert's Basis Theorem says that if $R$ is Noetherian, then so is $R[t_1]$. By induction, then, it follows that $R[t_1,\cdots,t_n]$ is Noetherian.
Now, as user26857 says in the comments, in a Noetherian ring, every ideal is finitely generated. For completeness, I'll give a proof of that fact:
First, recall that Noetherian means that every ascending chain terminates. I.e, every chain of ideals $I_1 \subset I_2 \subset I_3 \cdots \subset $ must terminate, meaning that $I_n = I_{n+1}$ for all $n \gg 0$.
For an example: Let $R=k[t_1,t_2]$. Then we have the chain of ideals $(0) \subset (t_1) \subset (t_1,t_2)$. It is not possible to squeeze more ideals in this sequence.
Now I'll prove that assuming the ascending chain condition, every ideal is finitely generated. Suppose the opposite, i.e. $I$ requires an infinite number of minimal generators $I=\langle f_1,\cdots,f_k,f_{k+1},\dotsc \rangle$. Then you can make an infinite descending chain ($I_k=\langle f_1,\cdots,f_k \rangle$), contrary to the Noetherian assumption. Thus every ideal in a Noetherian ring is finitely generated.
In fact, the implication goes the other way as well. That is, if every ideal is finitely generated, then the ascending chain condition holds. This is easy: suppose the opposite, i.e. the existence of an infinite ascending chain of ideals $\{ I_k \}_{k=0}^\infty$. Then the ideal $\bigcup_k I_k$ is finitely generated, by say $\{ x_1,\cdots,x_r\}$. Each of these belong to some $I_k$, so choosing $\ell$ to be the maximal such $k$, we see that all $x_r$ belong to $I_\ell$. Hence $I_\ell = \langle x_1,\cdots,x_r \rangle$, so the chain is stationary.