I am trying to see that homology with coefficients commutes with direct limits, that is let $(G_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in D}$ be a direct system of groups and $G :=\lim_{\longrightarrow}G_{\alpha}$. I'm trying to see that $\lim H_*(G_{\alpha},M)\cong H_*(G,M)$. If we take the standard resolution $F_{\alpha}$, we know that $\lim H_*(G_{\alpha},M)=\lim H_*(F_{\alpha}\otimes_{G_{\alpha}} M) = H_*(\lim(F_{\alpha}\otimes_{G_{\alpha}} M))$, so what I am trying to see is that $\lim(F_{\alpha}\otimes_{G_{\alpha}} M) \cong (\lim F_{\alpha})\otimes_{G}M$ to get what I want, but I am not seeing how to do this, do I create an explicit isomorphism between them both and try using restriction of scalars maybe, it just a bit confusing for me because we are in the category of chain complexes. Thanks in advance.
2026-04-05 23:06:26.1775430386
Homology with coefficients and direct Limits
141 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HOMOLOGY-COHOMOLOGY
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- $f$ - odd implies $d(f)$ - odd, question to the proof
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- understanding proof of excision theorem
- proof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram
- exact sequence of reduced homology groups
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in HOMOLOGICAL-ALGEBRA
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- $A$ - dga over field, then $H^i(A) = 0, i > 1$ implies $HH_i(A) = 0, i < -1$
- Tensor product $M\otimes_B Hom_B(M,B)$ equals $End_B(M)$, $M$ finitely generated over $B$ and projective
- Group cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}(V)$
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- Existence of adjugant with making given natural transformation be the counit
- Noetherian property is redundant?
- What is the monomorphism that forms the homology group?
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
(As a general note, be careful with the notation $\lim$ : in your situation you want to use \varinjlim, which gives $\varinjlim$, otherwise there's a pretty strong conflict of notation with other notions of limit - the best, of course, being to use colimits, although this may not be the most common thing in algebra)
The result is true; here's a "categorical" proof :
you have, for each $n$, a direct system of abelian groups : $F_{\alpha,n}\otimes_{G_\alpha}M$ and want to compare it to $F_n\otimes_G M$.
Note that $\mathbb Z[-]$ commutes with direct limits : if you don't already know this, you should try and prove it. This allows you (using the standard resolution, as you mentioned), to have $\varinjlim F_\alpha = F$ (where $F$ is the standard resolution over $G$)
Now the key point is to notice that $F_{\alpha,n}\otimes_{G_\alpha}M$ is the coequalizer of $$F_{\alpha,n}\otimes \mathbb Z[G_\alpha]\otimes M \rightrightarrows F_{\alpha,n}\otimes M$$
where the two arrows are $x\otimes g \otimes m\mapsto (xg)\otimes m$ and $x\otimes g\otimes m \mapsto x\otimes (gm)$ respectively.
This is interesting because these maps are compatible with the maps in the direct system: for $\alpha \leq \beta$, the two obvious squares commute :
$\require{AMScd}\begin{CD}F_{\alpha,n}\otimes \mathbb Z[G_\alpha]\otimes M @>>> F_{\alpha,n}\otimes M\\ @VVV @VVV \\ F_{\beta,n}\otimes \mathbb Z[G_\beta]\otimes M @>>> F_{\beta,n}\otimes M\end{CD}$
Now a general property is that colimits commute, so taking the coequalizer and then the direct limit is the same thing as taking first the direct limit and then the coequalizer.
Since $-\otimes M$ commutes with colimits, you are left with examining the direct limit of $F_{\alpha,n}\otimes \mathbb Z[G_\alpha]\otimes M$. But that one is easy to identify with $F_n\otimes \mathbb Z[G]\otimes M$, for the same kind of reason.
So your direct limit is just the coequalizer of $$F_n\otimes \mathbb Z[G]\otimes M \rightrightarrows F_n\otimes M$$
i.e. $F_n\otimes_G M$.
Note that under suitable hypotheses on $(M_\alpha)$, this can easily be adapted for a direct system where $M_\alpha$ is a $G_\alpha$-module (and you have to define a suitable $G$-module structure on $M:=\varinjlim M_\alpha$)