How can I prove that $$\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\exp\left(-\frac{(k-1)k}{2n}\right)=0?$$ I'm really trying to avoid big-O notation and complicated asymptotic-behaviour arguments.
It seems that each of the terms converges to $1$ as $n$ gets large. There are $n$ such terms, so if we divide the sum by $n$, it looks like the entire limit behaves like $n/n\to1\neq0$? My intuition is clearly wrong.
If the $n$ is the denominator in the exponential was $n^2$, then the limit could be computed via Riemann sums. If the term $k(k-1)$ was $k$, we could also use Riemann sums. Fix an $R>0$; for $n\geqslant R$, $$ 0\leqslant \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\exp\left(-\frac{(k-1)k}{2n}\right)= \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\exp\left(-\frac{(k-1)kn}{2n^2}\right)\leqslant \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\exp\left(-\frac{(k-1)kR}{2n^2}\right). $$ Using Riemann sums, we derive that for all $R$, $$ 0\leqslant \limsup_{n\to +\infty}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^{n}\exp\left(-\frac{(k-1)k}{2n}\right)\leqslant\int_0^1\exp\left(-Rt^2/2\right)dt. $$ Now, we control the last integral in the following way: we use the fact that $\exp\left(-Rt^2/2\right)$ is small than one and that $\exp\left(-Rt^2/2\right)\leqslant \exp\left(-R\delta^2/2\right)$ for $t\geqslant \delta$ to get $$ \int_0^1\exp\left(-Rt^2/2\right)dt\leqslant\delta+ \exp\left(-R\delta^2/2\right) . $$