Paul lockhart in his book "Measurement" shows that every hyperbola is a dilated version of right-hyperbola by just using geometric reasoning (dilation, angles, etc) without using trigonometry, algebra, calculus, linear algebra, co-ordinate geometry. But doesn't prove the above mentioned conjecture along the way. The best I'm able to do is to just say that projection (dilation) of a conic section (in this case hyperbola) is still a conic section (which must be hyperbola because it was a broken curve before projection too). Can you guys come up with a more satisfying proof for above mentioned conjecture using only elementary geometric reasoning?
Edit: The direction of dilation can be either the axis passing through two Foci or the axis perpendicular to it.
Edit2: The "Dilation" in contrast to scaling, only streches or squishes all the lengths only along a particular direction. Think of it like streching a rubber sheet but only along one direction.



For a geometric intuition, you can use the fact that the hyperbola is a conic section. In particular, given a hyperbola in plane $\pi_1$, choose a right circular double cone whose axis is parallel to $\pi_1$ and that intersects $\pi_1$ in the given hyperbola.
Now if you dilate the entire space along the direction of the cone's axis, you still have a right circular double cone intersecting the dilated plane $\pi_1$ in a hyperbola.
If you linearly transform space by scaling all planes perpendicular to the cone's axis by the same amount, while keeping the distances between the planes fixed, you get another right circular double cone intersecting $\pi_1$ in a hyperbola. Meanwhile $\pi_1$ has been dilated in the direction perpendicular to the axis through the foci of the hyperbola. (This is equivalent to two dilations by the same amount, one in plane $\pi_1$ perpendicular to the axis through the foci, and one perpendicular to the plane. Note that the axis of the cone ends up at a different distance from the plane after the dilations.)