

I found solution of exercise that said show that A is rotation to do that we have to compute det A=1 but they found it directly
Is there any relationship between the first coefficient and minor to say directly without complete computing that $\det A=1$
- how they deduce that det A=1 just from the first coeffcient and minor
$DetA = 1$ is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a matrix being a rotation. To be a rotation $A^T = A^{-1}$ (and here we include reflections composed with rotations, ie $detA = \pm 1$).