I recently started tensors and my textbook mentions the following identity: \begin{equation} \varepsilon_{ijkl}\varepsilon_{mnpl} = \delta_{im}\delta_{jn}\delta_{kp}-\delta_{im}\delta_{jp}\delta_{kn}+\delta_{in}\delta_{jp}\delta_{km}\\ \hspace{1.7cm}-\delta_{in}\delta_{jm}\delta_{kp}+\delta_{ip}\delta_{jm}\delta_{kn}-\delta_{ip}\delta_{jn}\delta_{km} \end{equation} How do I prove this? For the 3 dimensional analog, i.e., \begin{equation} \varepsilon_{ijk}\varepsilon_{mnk} = \delta_{im}\delta_{jn} - \delta_{in}\delta_{jm} \end{equation} I verified the contraction identity by writing down each case for all indices. But that is not a proof, just a verification, and I think verifying in a similar fashion for 4th dimension is going to be cumbersome. Is there any general prescription to prove such contractions, possibly for any $n$-th order, greater than 4? Or at least for 4th order if not $n$?
2026-04-25 05:19:09.1777094349
How to contract a 4th rank Levi Civita tensor?
686 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICS
- Why boundary conditions in Sturm-Liouville problem are homogeneous?
- What is the value of alternating series which I mention below
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Return probability random walk
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Self adjoint operators on incomplete spaces
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
- Compute time required to travel given distance with constant acceleration and known initial speed
Related Questions in TENSORS
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- tensor differential equation
- Decomposing an arbitrary rank tensor into components with symmetries
- What is this notation?
- Confusion about vector tensor dot product
- Generalization of chain rule to tensors
- Tensor rank as a first order formula
- $n$-dimensional quadratic equation $(Ax)x + Bx + c = 0$
- What's the best syntax for defining a matrix/tensor via its indices?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You are right.
After three dimensions, the regular Kronecker delta $\delta^i_j$ simply stops being useful on its own. We need to transition to the Generalized Kronecker Delta, $$\delta^{i_1\dots i_p}_{j_1\dots j_p}=\begin{cases}0 & \text{if any }i\text{s or }j\text{s are repeated} \\ +1 & \text{if }j_1\dots j_p\text{ is an even permutation of }i_1\dots i_p \\ -1 & \text{if }j_1\dots j_p\text{ is an odd permutation of }i_1\dots i_p \end{cases}$$ It may be written as a determinant, $$\delta^{i_1\dots i_p}_{j_1\dots j_p}=\det\begin{bmatrix}\delta^{i_1}_{j_1}&\cdots &\delta^{i_1}_{j_p} \\ \vdots&\ddots & \vdots \\ \delta^{i_p}_{j_1}&\dots&\delta^{i_p}_{j_p}\end{bmatrix}$$
Higher-order versions of the Levi-Civita symbol are generally defined using the generalized Kronecker delta:
$$\epsilon_{i_1\dots i_n}\equiv \delta^{1\dots n}_{i_1\dots i_n}$$
It can be shown that
$$\epsilon^{i_1\dots i_s~k_1\dots k_n}\epsilon_{j_1\dots j_s~k_1\dots k_n}=n!~\delta^{i_1\dots i_s}_{j_1\dots j_s}$$
Which in our case gives us
$$\epsilon^{ijkl}\epsilon_{mnpl}=\delta^{ijk}_{mnp} =\det\begin{bmatrix}\delta^i_m &\delta^i_n &\delta^i_p \\ \delta^j_m& \delta^j_n& \delta^j_p \\\delta^k_m &\delta^k_n &\delta^k_p \end{bmatrix}$$ (Thankfully there will be 6 terms, as expected!)
Now you can expand this determinant to your hearts content.