I'm doing Exercise 3.8 in Chapter II of Hartshorne, on the construction of the normalization of an integral scheme. Let $X$ be an integral scheme and let $\{U_i=\operatorname{Spec}(A_i)\}_{i\in I}$ the set of all non-empty affine open subsets of $X$, indexed by some index set $I$. For $i\in I$ let $\tilde{U_i}:=\operatorname{Spec}(\tilde{A_i})$, where $\tilde{A_i}$ is the integral closure of $A_i$ inside its fraction field. According to Hartshorne, the $\tilde{U_i}$'s can be glued together, and the resulting scheme will be the normalization of $X$. So in order to glue them together (with exercise 2.12, the Glueing lemma), we need to define open sets $U_{ij}\subseteq \tilde{U_i}$ for all $i\neq j$, such that for all such $i,j$ we have an isomorphism $\varphi_{ij}:U_{ij}\to U_{ji}$, along with some more compatibility properties. But I'm already struggling with the proper definition of $U_{ij}$. The natural thing to do would be to define $U_{ij}:=\iota_{i}^{-1}(U_i\cap U_j)$, where $\iota_i:\tilde{U_i}\to U_i$ is the morphism induced from the inclusion $A_i\hookrightarrow \tilde{A_i}$. But then I don't see how to construct the isomorphism $\varphi_{ij}$, because there could be many prime ideals in $\tilde{A_i}$ contracting to the same ideal in $A_i$. How to proceed?
2026-03-27 21:36:23.1774647383
How to glue the integral closures of the affine pieces in an integral scheme (Hartshorne II.3.8)?
402 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
$\newcommand{\ol}{\overline} \newcommand{\Frac}{\operatorname{Frac}} \newcommand{\Spec}{\operatorname{Spec}}$
Lemma. If $\Spec A$ and $\Spec B$ are two affine open subschemes of a common scheme $X$, the intersection $\Spec A\cap \Spec B$ can be covered by simultaneously-distinguished affine opens $\Spec A_f = \Spec B_g$.
Proof: see here, for instance. $\blacksquare$
Lemma: localization commutes with taking integral closures. To be precise, let $A$ be an integral domain, $S$ a multiplicatively closed subset of $A$, and let $\ol{A}$ denote the integral closure of $A$ in its field of fractions. Then the claim is that $\ol{S^{-1}A}=S^{-1}\ol{A}$.
Proof: In one direction, $S^{-1}\ol{A}\subset \ol{S^{-1}A}$: if $z\in\Frac{A}$ is integral over $A$, satisfying the monic polynomial $x^n+\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_ix^i$ where $a_i\in A$, then $\frac{z}{s}$ is integral over $\ol{S^{-1}A}$ since it satisfies the monic polynomial $x^n+\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} \frac{a_i}{s^{n-i}} x^i$ which has coefficients in $S^{-1}A$. Conversely, if $\frac{f}{g}\in Frac(A)$ is integral over $S^{-1}A$, then it satisfies the monic polynomial $x^n+\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_ix^i$ where $a_i\in S^{-1}A$. But then we can find an $s\in S$ so that $s\frac{f}{g}$ satisfies the monic polynomial $x^n+\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} a_i'x^i$ with $a_i'\in A$ by clearing denominators appropriately. So $\ol{S^{-1}A}\subset S^{-1}\ol{A}$, and the claim is proven. $\blacksquare$
Now suppose that $\{\Spec A_i\}_{i\in I}$ is the collection of all open affine subschemes of $X$. Since the $\Spec A_i$ glue together to form $X$, we have a gluing data as per exercise II.2.12. Now cover $\Spec A_i\cap \Spec A_j$ by simultaneously-distinguished open subsets $\Spec (A_i)_a=\Spec (A_j)_b$ by the first lemma. Since integral closures commute with localizations, we have that the preimage of $\Spec (A_i)_a$ in $\Spec \ol{A_i}$ and $\Spec (A_i)_b$ in $\Spec \ol{A_j}$ are both isomorphic. This implies that the preimages of $\Spec A_i\cap \Spec A_j$ in $\Spec \ol{A_i}$ and $\Spec \ol{A_j}$ are isomorphic, and since we constructed this isomorphism naturally, we have that it forms a gluing data for the $\Spec \ol{A_i}$, giving us $\nu(X)$, the normalization.