How to interpret Combinatorics?

68 Views Asked by At

so this is my first time asking a question. I'm currently in my third year of university studying a lot of probability and statistics and even to this day combinatorics has not been my strong suit.

I was wondering if there was an overarching way to interpret a combinatoric or at least a mind set when dealing with these questions. For example $$ C(a,b) = a!/(b!*(a-b)!) $$ So at it's most basic how I learnt this was. C(a,b) is the number of combinations of b items you can get from a items. However when doing probability subjects I've noticed many different ideas are used in the same way. For example. If we have a possible slots for items to go in. C(a,b) is the number of combinations that b items (where a>b) can go into the available a slots.

Or If we have a row of a items, and b of them are identical, and the remaining b - a of them are also identical but not the same as the first b items. C(a,b) is the number of possible permutations of all those items if they were placed in a row.

Honestly wrapping my mind around all these different interpretations gives me a headache. Is there a better overall interpretation/definition of what C(a,b) is and what it represents or is it nothing more than simplified factorical algebra that has too broad an application to generally understand base on application?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

By definition, $C(n,k)={n\choose k}$ is the number of $k$-element subsets of the set $[n]:=\{1,2,3,\ldots, n\}$. In order to find a formula for this number one has to do a certain sequence of mental movements, and finally one arrives at $$C(n,k)={n\choose k}={n!\over k!(n-k)!}\qquad(0\leq k\leq n)\ .\tag{1}$$ I'm sure you have seen a proof of this formula, but you would believe it anyway.

But this is only one part of the story. It seems your headaches have to do with something else: Combinatorial problems come in many different guises. You have given several combinatorial stories that all lead to the $C(n,k)$. This as nothing to do with factorials etc., but with structural insight into the problem at hand. E.g., if the given set is a set of $n$ different colors instead of $[n]$ this should not make a difference for the number of color combinations. When you have some exercise you should immediately see that placing $a$ white balls and $b$ black balls in a row amounts to selecting $a$ white places in an empty row of length $a+b$; hence there are ${a+b\choose a}$ ways to do it.