If $f(x)$ = $e^x$ + x, what is $f(x+3)$ in terms of $f(x)$?

91 Views Asked by At

As the title suggests, the question is rather simple:

"$f(x)$ = $e^x$ + x. Write $f(x+3)$ in terms of $f(x)$."

I encountered this problem in an precalc textbook, in the chapter regarding functions, and couldn't find the solution anywhere in the book. Although I have made progress in finding a solution (see below), I'm not quite sure if my steps are right, and whether or not my solution is in the simplest form possible.

My logic goes as follows:

$f(x+3) =e^{x+3} + x + 3$

Set f(x) = y.

$y = e^x + x$

$e^x = y - x$

$ln(e^x) = ln(y-x)$

$x = ln(y -x)$

I was able to notice that this is recursive, and got the following:

$x = ln(y - ln(y - ln(y - \dots)))$

Plugging this into our expression for $f(x+3)$, we get:

$f(x+3) = e^3(e^x) + x + 3$

$f(x+3) = e^3(e^{ln(y - ln(y - ln(y - \dots)))}) + ln(y - ln(y - ln(y - \dots))) + 3$

$f(x+3) = e^3(y - ln(y - ln(y - \dots)))) + ln(y - ln(y - ln(y - \dots))) + 3$

$f(x+3) = e^3(f(x) - ln(f(x) - ln(f(x) - \dots)))) + ln(f(x) - ln(f(x) - ln(f(x) - \dots))) + 3$

So, I've gotten to this point, but I'm not sure how to proceed- or whether or not I'd even need to proceed any further. Is a recursive answer like this one acceptable for such a question? If not, how can I try and express $f(x+3)$ in a non-recursive manner?

Thanks in advance.