If summation of Projections on Vector Space over complex number is Identity then their pairwise product is Zero operator.

445 Views Asked by At

Let $F$ be a subfield of the complex numbers (or, a field of characteristic zero). Let $V$ be a finite-dimensional vector space over $F$. Suppose that $E_1,\dots,E_k$ are projections of $V$ and that $E_1+\dots+E_k=I$. Prove that $E_iE_j=0$ for $i\ne j$. (Hint: Use the trace function and ask yourself what the trace of a projection is.

This is Exercise 10 from Section 6.6 (Direct-Sum Decompositions) in Hoffman, Kunze: Linear algebra.

I have following solution enter image description here

Please help in understanding: If $W_{ij}$ is the range of $E_iE_j$. Then (a) how $tr(E_iE_j)=\dim(W_{ij})$ and (b) if $\dim(W_{ij})=0$ then how $E_iE_j=0$ for $i\ne j$?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On

The comment was wrong!

Yes, we do require simultaneous diagonalizability, which then takes some time to prove, so as Berci says, this method is more time taking than another proof which I will show.

For this, we need to show that the projections commute i.e. $E_iE_k = E_kE_i$. For this, write $\sum E_j = I$. Therefore, $\sum_{j \neq i} E_j = I-E_i$. From here, we get $\sum_{j \neq i} E_iE_jE_i =E_i(1-E_i)E_i=0$. Now, note that $E_iE_jE_i = (E_iE_j)(E_iE_j)^H$ since $E_i,E_j$ are projections, so we get $\sum_{j \neq i} (E_iE_j)(E_iE_j)^H = 0$.

(Where $\cdot^H$ denotes the conjugate transpose, or the Hermitian transpose).

From this, clearly $E_iE_j = 0$ for each $i,j$, see this yourself.

This is the shortest method to show that $E_i,E_j$ commute, but it also shows the products are zero, as desired. I think you should go with this proof itself.