In Lee's Smooth Manifolds, it is written that the inverse function theorem can fail for manifolds with boundary. As hint, it is given the inclusion of half space into euclidean space $\iota:\mathbb{H}^n\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^n$
My guess is that this is merely a matter of being open rather than really deep problems, or?
2026-03-25 14:27:23.1774448843
Inverse Function Theorem for Manifolds with Boundary as the Domain
2.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS-WITH-BOUNDARY
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Integration of one-form
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
- Giving a counterexample for the extension lemma of smooth functions
- A question about the proof of Extension Lemma for Smooth functions
- Manifolds with boundary and foliations
- Pullbacks and differential forms, require deep explanation + algebra rules
- Possible to describe random 3D surfaces (geograhical height over limited area) by formula?
- Can you hear the pins fall from bowling game scores?
Related Questions in INVERSE-FUNCTION-THEOREM
- Inverse function theorem via degree theory
- Function satisfying $(Df(x)h,h) \geq \alpha(h,h), \forall x,h \in \mathbb{R}^n$ has an inverse around every point?
- Prove for all point $(x_0,y_0)\not =(0,0)$ the restriction of $f$ to neighborhood $(x_0,y_0)$ have inverse.
- Question on the proof of the inverse function theorem
- Find Jacobian and rank of differential. Inverse function theorem.
- Is a continuously differentiable bi-Lipschitz map on $\mathbf R^d$ a $C^1$-diffeomorphism?
- Application of the Inverse function theorem for $f:M_n(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow M_n(\mathbb{R})$, $f(A)=A^2$.
- Explanation of "without loss of generality" in an application of Inverse Function Theorem.
- If $F(x+y,x/y)=0$ for $F$ smooth and $(x,y)$ in any open subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$, then $F=0$ on an open subset.
- Laplacian of the inverse of a diffeomorphism
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, your guess is right -- it's just that you can't find (open) neighborhoods of the given points that are diffeomorphic.
The theorem you're looking at in my book (Thm. 4.5) says
What fails in an example like $\iota:\mathbb H^n\to \mathbb R^n$ is that you can't find any neighborhood of $0$ in $\mathbb H^n$ that's diffeomorphic to a neighborhood of $0$ in $\mathbb R^n$.
It boils down to what we mean by the word "locally." To say a map $F:M\to N$ is locally invertible usually means (at least) that for each $p\in M$, there exist a neighborhood $U$ of $p$ and a neighborhood $V$ of $f(p)$ such that $f|_U:U\to V$ is bijective. If you don't require $V$ to be a neighborhood, then every smooth immersion would be locally invertible. I guess you could define the term that way, but it's not the way most people understand it.