How to calculate this monstrous expression? $$ \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{1!} & \frac{1}{2!} & \frac{1}{3!} & \frac{1}{4!} & \frac{1}{5!}& \cdots\\ 0 & \frac{1}{1!} & \frac{1}{2!} & \frac{1}{3!} & \frac{1}{4!}& \cdots \\ -2 & 0 & \frac{1}{1!} & \frac{1}{2!} & \frac{1}{3!} & \cdots \\ 0 & -3 & 0 & \frac{1}{1!} & \frac{1}{2!} & \cdots \\ 0 & 0 & -4 & 0 & \frac{1}{1!} & \cdots \\ \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots \end{pmatrix}^{-1} \begin{pmatrix}0\\1\\0\\0\\0\\0\\\vdots\end{pmatrix} $$ I don't think trying to find the inverse of this huge matrix (which I am not able to) will be helpful, as we only need the $2^{nd}$ column of the inverse matrix. Any help is appreciated! Thank You!
2026-02-22 20:42:11.1771792931
Inverse of an Infinite Matrix (with factorials)
291 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in INVERSE
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Proving whether a matrix is invertible
- Proof verification : Assume $A$ is a $n×m$ matrix, and $B$ is $m×n$. Prove that $AB$, an $n×n$ matrix is not invertible, if $n>m$.
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Show that if $a_1,\ldots,a_n$ are elements of a group then $(a_1\cdots a_n)^{-1} =a_n^{-1} \cdots a_1^{-1}$
- Simplifying $\tan^{-1} {\cot(\frac{-1}4)}$
- Invertible matrix and inverse matrix
- show $f(x)=f^{-1}(x)=x-\ln(e^x-1)$
- Inverse matrix for $M_{kn}=\frac{i^{(k-n)}}{2^n}\sum_{j=0}^{n} (-1)^j \binom{n}{j}(n-2j)^k$
- What is the determinant modulo 2?
Related Questions in INFINITE-MATRICES
- Inverse of an Infinite Matrix (with factorials)
- Matrix exponential, containing a thermal state
- Spectrum of an infinite matrix
- Infinite matrix which cannot be represented by bounded linear operator
- Distance from a vector to a linear span vectors in a separable Hilbert space.
- Derive prime-identifying functions from inverse Vandermonde and Bernoulli numbers
- Is the Birkhoff–von Neumann theorem true for infinite matrices?
- Inverse of an infinite matrix with factorial entries
- Cutting off an infinite matrix(Making a finite matrix from an infinite matrix)
- Find the Inverse of an Infinite Square Matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Using inversion by LDU-decomposition and including Euler-summation for the occuring divergent dot-products I get for the first couple of entries derivatives of the gamma-function $\Gamma(x)$ at argument $1$:
$$ \begin{array}{r|rl} i & \text{num value} & \text{interpretation} \\ \hline 1 & -0.577215664902 & = \Gamma^{(1)} (1) \\ 2 & 1.97809833665 & = \Gamma^{(2)} (1) \\ 3 & -5.44487445649 & = \Gamma^{(3)} (1) \\ 4 & 23.5614740841 & = \Gamma^{(4)} (1) \end{array}$$
So I think, this continues for the other entries of the result-vector and the interpretation, suggested by the approximations, hold in general.
Using Pari/GP we get the found values in the exponential generating-function for the $\Gamma(1+x)$:
Appendix Tables
Here are the top-left segments of the LDU-components such that $M=L \cdot D \cdot U$:
Here are their inverses, such that $$ M^{-1} = \lim_{dim \to \infty} U^{-1} \underset {\mathfrak E} * ( D^{-1} \cdot L^{-1})$$ where $\underset {\mathfrak E} * $ means doing the divergent dotproducts using Euler-summation
Because we have the convergent dotproduct $L^{-1} \cdot I_1$ where $I_1 =[0,1,0,0,...]$ we need only the second column of $L^{-1}$ and the part $ \text{rhs}=D^{-1} \cdot L^{-1} \cdot I_1 $ gives, in decimal notation
The dot-products of left-multiplication with $U^{-1}$ include Eulersummation to assign the divergent sums of alternating series finite values. We get the following approximations: