Typically, $e^c$ is taken to be single-valued. However, by the definition of the complex exponential $z^c$, it can be taken to have multiple values. For example, $\sqrt{e} \approx \pm 1.6$. Now, if a complex variable is raised to an integer power, all of the multiple values will be equal by virtue of the behavior of $2n\pi$ mod $2\pi$. Fractional powers will have more than one value, and this leads me to a point of curiosity. Because $e$ is irrational, the only multiple of $e$ that will be equal to an integer is $0e$. Unlike the rational powers of $e$, the multiple values will never stack on top of each other, and intuitively that means that the whole circle of $|z|=|e^e|$ will eventually be reached by some value of the function. Is this true? If not, what are the properties of that set?
2026-03-26 04:28:59.1774499339
Is $e^e$ equal to every point on the circle $z=|e^e|$?
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Related Questions in IRRATIONAL-NUMBERS
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- $\alpha$ is an irrational number. Is $\liminf_{n\rightarrow\infty}n\{ n\alpha\}$ always positive?
- Is this : $\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{\cdots}}}}}$ irrational number?
- ls $\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}$ the only sum of two irrational which close to $\pi$?
- Find an equation where all 'y' is always irrational for all integer values of x
- Is a irrational number still irrational when we apply some mapping to its decimal representation?
- Density of a real subset $A$ such that $\forall (a,b) \in A^2, \ \sqrt{ab} \in A$
- Proof of irrationality
- Is there an essential difference between Cartwright's and Niven's proofs of the irrationality of $\pi$?
- Where am I making a mistake in showing that countability isn't a thing?
Related Questions in TRANSCENDENTAL-NUMBERS
- Two minor questions about a transcendental number over $\Bbb Q$
- Is it possible to express $\pi$ as $a^b$ for $a$ and $b$ non-transcendental numbers?
- Is it true that evaluating a polynomial with integer coefficients at $e$, uniquely defines it?
- Is $\frac{5\pi}{6}$ a transcendental or an algebraic number?
- Is there any intermediate fields between these two fields?
- Is there any pair of positive integers $ (x,n)$ for which :$e^{{e}^{{e}^{\cdots x}}}=2^{n}$?
- Why is :$\displaystyle {e}^\sqrt{2}$ is known to be transcedental number but ${\sqrt{2}}^ {e}$ is not known?
- Irrationality of $\int_{-a}^ax^nn^xd x$
- Proving that $ 7<\frac{5\phi e}{\pi}< 7.0000689$ where $\phi$ is the Golden Ratio
- Transcendence of algebraic numbers with Transcendental power
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Maybe you would like to read this section about complex exponentiation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Complex_exponents_with_complex_bases
What you are saying is sort of true, but not really. If anyone ever saw $e^e$, they would always interpret it as a real exponentiation, which has one value $\approx 15.15$. However, if we insist on interpreting one or both of the $e$'s as complex numbers, we can get other values.
A still reasonable interpretation would be $e^e=\exp(e)$, where we think of the input as a complex number. The exponential function $\exp(z)$ is well-defined and unique even for complex inputs, so we get the same real answer. In general $$ e^{x+iy} = e^x\cdot (\cos y + i\sin y) $$
Now, what you are doing is interpreting the base $e$ as a complex number. If we do this, then you are right. We get: $$ e^e := \exp(e\log e) = \exp(e\cdot(1+2k\pi i)) = e^e\cdot e^{e\cdot2k\pi i} , \quad \mathrm{for}\ k\in\mathbb Z $$ The key difference is that $\log$ is now the complex logarithm, which is multivalued. This hits countably infinitely many points on the circle with radius $e^e$, but by no means all of them (since there uncountably many points on the circle). For example, the angle $q\pi$ for a non-zero, rational $q$, will never be attained. However, the points will be dense in the circle, i.e. in any arc on the circle, there will be infinitely many of the points. It is just like how the rational numbers are distributed on the real number line.
But let me just repeat: No one would normally say that $e^e$ has infinitely many values!