TLDR; Is every fundamental group of a mapping torus of a surface homeomorphism a CAT(0) group?
Let $S$ be a compact surface of negative Euler characteristic and let $f :S\to S$ be a homeomorphism. Write $M_f$ to denote the mapping torus of $f$, $$M_f = \frac{S \times [0,1]}{(0,f(x)) \sim (1, x)}.$$
Thurston shows that:
- If $f$ is pseudo-Anosov then $M_f$ admits a complete hyperbolic structure of finite volume.
- If $f$ is finite order then $M_f$ admits a complete $\mathbb{H}^2 \times \mathbb{R}$ structure.
- If $f$ is reducible then $M_f$ admits an embedded incompressible torus, not parallel to the boundary.
If $S$ has empty boundary, then in cases 1 and 2 we can conclude that $M_f$ acts properly and cocompactly on $\mathbb{H}^{3}$ and $\mathbb{H}^2 \times \mathbb{R}$, respectively, and thus that $\pi_1(M_f)$ is CAT(0).
My question: What can be said in the case when $S$ (and thus $M_f$) has non-empty boundary? What can be said in case 3?
In Cases 1 and 2 with nonempty boundary, the complete metric on $M_f$ can be truncated to give a metric on a compact space, by "cutting off horoballs". In Case 1 you cut off a $\pi_1 M_f$-invariant, pairwise disjoint family of open, 3-dimensional hyperbolic horoballs in $\mathbb H^3$, leaving $\mathbb R^2$ boundaries, and then mod out by the group, leaving torus boundaries. In Case 2 you cut off a $\pi_1(S)$-invariant, pairwise disjoint family of open 2-dimensional hyperbolic horodiscs in the $\mathbb H^2$ factor, leaving $\mathbb R$ boundaries in that factor, and then cross with the $\mathbb R$ factor, leaving $\mathbb R^2$ boundaries; and then again you mod out by the group leaving torus boundaries. In either case, the restricted path metric is a CAT(0) metric (this is probably explained in the book of Bridson and Haefliger).
In Case 3, there's some literature you can consult. I can't find a complete description, and the totality of what I can find canot be squeezed into an answer, but there's several results in this paper of Bernard Leeb as a start. For example, in the case of empty boundary, Theorem 3.3 of that paper, combined with Thurston's geometrization theorem, implies that if at least one component of the Thurston decomposition of $f$ is pseudo-Anosov then $M_f$ admits a CAT(0) geometry.
Case 3 get more complicated in the subcase that every component of the Thurston decomposition of $f$ is finite order, and so every component of the torus decomposiiton of $M_f$ is Seifert fibered. Dropping for a moment the hypothesis that $M$ is a mapping torus, Leeb's paper describes an examples of a closed, irreducible manifold $M$ whose torus decomposition has only Seifert fibered pieces, and where $M$ itself has no locally CAT(0) metric, and yet $\pi_1(M)$ is a CAT(0) group. But I do not know whether such examples exist where $M$ is a mapping torus, and I do not know whether any mapping torus examples exist where the group is not CAT(0).