Is the category of Hausdorff, compactly generated, locally path-connected, semi-locally 1-connected spaces (and continuous maps between them) cartesian closed? If not, in what ways does it fail to be?
2026-03-30 14:41:16.1774881676
Is the category of these particularly nice spaces cartesian closed?
100 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I don't think $Y^X$ is semilocally simply connected when $X$ isn't compact. The argument below is incomplete in that it uses the standard compact open topology on $Y^X$, while one would at least have to $k$-ify it, and probably do some more to stay inside the category you are considering. Nevertheless, I think it shows that semilocal simple connectedness probably fails for function spaces.
Consider $X=Y$ equal to the disjoint union of infinitely many circles $$\coprod_{n\in\Bbb N}\;S^1$$ and set $f=\mathrm{id}\in Y^X$. Semilocal simple connectedness means that there is a neighborhood $U\subset Y^X$ of $f$ with the property that every loop drawn in $U$ (and based at $f$) can be shrunk to a point inside $Y^X$. Equivalently, that there is a small neighborhood of $f$ with the property that every homotopy $H_t:f\xrightarrow{\sim} f$ drawn inside $U$ is homotopic to the constant homotopy inside $Y^X$. A neighborhood of $f$ in the compact open topology always contains an intersection of subbasic neighborhoods, say $U'$. Being a map $X\to Y$ in $U'$ simply means that you are close to $f$ on some compact subset $K$ of $X$. By compactness, $K\subset\coprod_{0\leq n<N}\;S^1$ for some $N$.
Then consider the homotopy $H$ between $f$ and $f$ with $H_t$ being the identity on all circles except for the $N$th circle where $H_t$ is rotation by $2\pi t$. By definition of $N$, this loop $H_t:f\to f$ stays inside $U'$. If $X^Y$ were semilocally simply connected there'd be a homotopy of loops from $H$ to the constant loop at $f$, and upon restricting to the $N$th circle we'd get a homotopy inside $(S^1)^{S^1}$ from the loop $t\mapsto R_{2\pi t}$ (rotation by $2\pi t$) to the constant loop $t\mapsto f$. Applying this homotopy of maps at a specific point, for instance $1\in S^1$ would give a homotopy from the identity of $S^1$ to the constant map $S^1\to S^1,z\mapsto 1$, which doesn't exist.