I am trying to explain that a circle is homeomorphic to a $6$-petal rose with the standard topology of $\mathbb R^2$, for that i'll need to explain (just in words, it is not necessary to come up with a formula) the homeomorphic function that maps one into the other.
So starting from the center of the rose, a series of continous changes can start to push neighboring points of the rose to the border of the circle, in the end every point should be at an equal $r$ distance from the center of the rose. The same thing goes for the inverse, starting with six equidistance points in the circumference, a series of continous chanages should push the their neighboing points following the trajectory of the petals to the center of the flower. The map and the inverse should be continous because an arbitrary open ball of a certain radius in one figure, should be map to another open ball of a certain radius in the other one. The problem is in the center of the flower where the points converge, there is no simil open set in the circle, would that mean that there is no bijection relationship between their topologies?, even though they both share the same. Is the open ball at the center of the flower different from the other ones?, so despite that the and its inverse are continous, it is not homeomorphic?, or the function is not continous?. I am stuck and can't find an explanaition that makes sense, so any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Kind Regards

They are not homeomorphic. If you remove the center of the rose, what remains is disconnected. However, if you remove a point from a circle, what remains stays connected.