Suppose I have an étale cover of a scheme $X$ by etale $X$-schemes $U_{i}$, let $U:=\coprod_{i=1}^{n} U_{i}$ and write $f:U\rightarrow X$ for the induced map. Then for every quasicoherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ it is possible to define a sheafified Cech complex with generic term $\mathcal{C}^{n}(U,\mathcal{F})=f_{n*}f_{n}^{*}\mathcal{F}$, where $f_{n}:U\times_{X}\times \cdots \times_{X}U \rightarrow X$ (n+1 copies). When we have an open cover instead of an etale cover we can take the complex without repetitions which is concentrated in degrees $\leq n$, which moreover is a resolution of $\mathcal{F}$. Does something similar hold here, in the sense that we get a resolution and that at some point some differential is zero so that we can divide the complex in two?
2026-03-26 04:52:04.1774500724
Is the sheafified Cech complex for an étale cover a resolution?
92 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SCHEMES
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Do torsion-free $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules on curves have dimension one?
- $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ is the sections of Spec $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ minus the origin?
- Finitely generated $k-$algebras of regular functions on an algebraic variety
- Is every open affine subscheme of an algebraic $k-$variety an affine $k-$variety?
- Scheme Theoretic Image (Hartshorne Ex.II.3.11.d)
- Is this a closed embedding of schemes?
- Adjunction isomorphism in algebraic geometry
- Closed connected subset of $\mathbb{P}_k^1$
- Why can't closed subschemes be defined in an easier way?
Related Questions in SHEAF-COHOMOLOGY
- Question about notation for Čech cohomology and direct image of sheaves in Hartshorne
- Image of a morphism of chain complexes of sheaves via direct/inverse image functor
- Does $H^2(X_{Zar},\mathcal{O}_X^\times)=0$ for $X$ a regular scheme?
- Computing the dimension of $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(D))$, where $D \subset X$ is a divisor
- Is the cohomology of a stalk the same as the stalk of the cohomology sheaf?
- If $H^i(\tilde{X}, \mathcal{F}) = 0$, then is it true that $H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$?
- Conditions on $\mathcal{F}$ such that $\chi(\mathcal{F}) = 0$ for a coherent sheaf on a curve over $k$.
- Cohomology and inverse image of divisors
- $\dim H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_D) \leq 1 + \deg D$ when $-1 \leq \deg D \leq g - 1$
- Bott vanishing from the Euler sequence
Related Questions in ETALE-COHOMOLOGY
- Structure of étale maps
- Clarification about Milne's Etale Cohomology text
- Open normal subgroups of Galois
- Surjectivity of map of étale sheaves
- Twists of etale cohomology
- Explicit formula to compute the conductor of Etale cohomology?
- Long exact sequence in etale cohomology with support
- Cycle class map and generalisation of Kummer theory
- How to compute $H^i_{\operatorname{fppf}}(\mathbb{P}^1,\alpha_p)$?
- Soulé vanishing for $H^2$ of $\mathbb{Q}_p(n)$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes the complex $\mathcal{C}^\bullet(U,\mathcal{F})$ is a resolution of $\mathcal{F}$. To prove it, it is enough to work locally : more precisely, if $g:V\to X$ is a cover, then $\mathcal{F}\to \mathcal{C}^\bullet$ is a resolution iff $g^*\mathcal{F}\to g^*\mathcal{C}^\bullet$ is a resolution.
There is an obvious cover that we can use : the cover $f:U\to X$ itself. It is easy to see that the complex you get is given by $g_n:U\times_X U\times_X ...\times_X\ U\to U$ ($n+2$ copies). But now, there are obvious sections. It follows that $f^*\mathcal{F}\to f^*\mathcal{C}^\bullet$ has an homotopy inverse. It follows that $\mathcal{C}^\bullet(U,\mathcal{F})$ is a resolution of $\mathcal{F}$ (though of course not an homotopy equivalence). This is trick is standard but extremely powerful, you should write the details to see what is going on.
I am not sure I understand what you mean by divide the complex in two. If you ask whether you can replace it by a bounded one, the answer is no. Even fields may non bounded étale cohomology.