Let $\mu,\nu$ be two discrete distributions on $\Bbb R$, and for simplicity assume that each takes only a finite number of values. For example, $\mu$ gives probabilities $p_i$ to points $x_i$ and $\nu$ gives probabilities $q_j$ to points $x_j$. The Kantorovich distance between them can be computed as $$ \int_{-\infty}^\infty |F_\mu(t) - F_\nu(t)|\mathrm dt. $$ Is there a way to simplify this expression in my setting?
2026-02-23 22:48:14.1771886894
Kantorovich distance: discrete distributions
7.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in OPTIMAL-TRANSPORT
- Lipschitz extension of affine function to whole space
- Closed-form analytical solutions to Optimal Transport/Wasserstein distance
- Monge and Kantorovich problem in optimal transport
- The Lebesgue measure as energy minimizer?
- Measurable selection of geodesics
- Choquet's and Birkhoff's theorem for min-max discrete optimization problems
- What was wrong with this argument?
- Example of a Minimum Cost Capacitated Flow Problem
- Negative cost coefficients in Transportation problem
- optimization loss due to misperceived probability
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$\newcommand{\d}{\mathrm{d}}$In fact the Wasserstein distance between two probability measures $P$ and $Q$ on a measurable space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ is defined as follows (I'll give the definition of the distance of order $1$):
$$ W(P,Q) = \inf_{\mu} \left\{ \int_{\Omega\times \Omega} |x-y|\d \mu \left| \begin{array}{l} \mu: \text{ prob. measure on } (\Omega \times \Omega, \mathcal{F}\otimes \mathcal{F})\\ \text{with marginals } P, Q \end{array} \right. \right\} $$
In the definition $\Omega\times \Omega$ is the product probability space. Notice that we may extend the definition so that $P$ is a measure on a space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ and $Q$ is a measure on $(\Omega', \mathcal{F}')$.
Let us now see how the above applies in the case of discrete sample spaces. For generality, let us assume that $P$ is a measure on $(\Omega, \mathcal{F})$ where $\Omega=\{\omega_i\}_{i=1}^{s}$ and $Q$ is a measure on $(\Omega', \mathcal{F}')$ where $\Omega'=\{\omega_i'\}_{i=1}^{s'}$ - here the two spaces are not required to have the same cardinality.
Then, the distance between $P$ and $Q$ becomes
$$ W(P,Q) = \inf_{\{\lambda_{i,j}\}_{i, j}} \left\{ \sum_{i=1}^{s}\sum_{j=1}^{s'}\lambda_{i,j} |\omega_i - \omega_j'|: \sum_{i=1}^{s}\lambda_{i,j} = q_j, \sum_{j=1}^{s'}\lambda_{i,j} = p_i, \lambda_{i,j}\geq 0 \right\} $$
This is a linear program, so it is easy to solve computationally.