I have worked with Laplace and Fourier transforms on numerous occasions, but I still struggle with understanding these transforms intuitively. As I prepare for qualifying exams in probability theory, they appear once again. The textbook I am working with presents this idea:
For a random variable $X \geq 0$, the Laplace transform of $X$ as a function of $s$ is defined as $L(s) = \text{E}\left[ e^{-sX} \right]$. This function $L \colon [0,\infty) \to \mathbb{R}$ is both well-defined and finite for all $s \in [0,\infty)$.
I know that if $X$ has PDF $f_X(x)$ (for either continuous or discrete random variables, in the latter case we use Dirac-delta functions for integrability), we may write $$ L(s) = \text{E}\left[ e^{-sX} \right] = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-sx} f_X(x) \text{d}x $$ Further, I understand that $e^{-sX}$ is decreasing in $y = sX$ since both $s \geq 0$ and $X \geq 0$. I can believe that this function $L(s)$ is well-defined since the integral expression clearly shows that if $s_1 = s_2$ then $L(s_1) = L(s_2)$.
What I am struggling to understand is why this expression is finite for all $s \in [0,\infty)$. Is there an intuitive explanation as to why this is true, perhaps related to the decreasing nature of $e^{-sX}$ or the Laplace transform's relation to frequency-space? Any help is greatly appreciated!
For all $s, x \ge 0$, $f_X(x)e^{-s x} \le f_X(x)$. Since $f_x(x)$ is a probability distribution, $\int_0^\infty f_X(x)dx = 1 < \infty$. Thus, $f_X(x)e^{-sx}$ is bounded by an integrable function, so it too must be integrable.