I just read in a textbook on numerical methods that you can always have that the right eigenvectors of a matrix can be taken as orthonormal to the left eigenvectors for a diagonalisable matrix. This seems suprising to me. I would have assumed that you need to have that the matrix is normal or hermitian, but is this also possible for all matrices?
2026-03-27 13:46:12.1774619172
Left and right eigenvectors perpendicular to each other
787 Views Asked by user66906 https://math.techqa.club/user/user66906/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in EIGENVALUES-EIGENVECTORS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Show that this matrix is positive definite
- Is $A$ satisfying ${A^2} = - I$ similar to $\left[ {\begin{smallmatrix} 0&I \\ { - I}&0 \end{smallmatrix}} \right]$?
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Evaluating a cubic at a matrix only knowing only the eigenvalues
- Eigenvalues of $A=vv^T$
- A minimal eigenvalue inequality for Positive Definite Matrix
- Construct real matrix for given complex eigenvalues and given complex eigenvectors where algebraic multiplicity < geometric multiplicity
Related Questions in SPECTRAL-THEORY
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Calculating spectrum and resolvent set of a linear operator (General question).
- Operator with compact resolvent
- bounded below operator/ Kato-Rellich
- Show directly that if $E_1\geqslant E_2\geqslant\dots$, then $E_i\rightarrow \bigwedge E_i$ strongly.
- Is the spectral radius less than $1$?
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Spectral radius inequality for non-abelian Banach algebras
- Do unitarily equivalent operators have the same spectrum?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I've never seen this before, but it's quite true.
What is a standard exercise is that when $\lambda\ne\mu$, with $x$ a $\lambda$-eigenvector for $A$ and $y$ a $\mu$-eigenvector for $y$, then $x\cdot y = 0$ (compute $Ax\cdot y$ two ways). But it wasn't obvious to me what happened with the $\lambda$ eigenvectors for both.
Consider the diagonalization $P^{-1}AP=\Lambda$. Then, transposing this equation, we obtain $Q^{-1}A^\top Q=\Lambda$, where $Q=(P^{-1})^\top$. The columns of $P$ and $Q$ are eigenvectors of $A$ and $A^\top$, respectively. But let's look at $Q^\top P$: the $ij$-entry will compute the dot product of the $i^{\text{th}}$ eigenvector of $A^\top$ and the $j^{\text{th}}$ eigenvector of $A$. But $Q^\top P = P^{-1}P = I$, which is the desired result.