Lei Fu' s Etale Cohomology theory, Proposition 2.5.3

149 Views Asked by At

I have a question on Lei Fu's Etale Cohomology theory, p.75, proposition 2.5.3.

First see the next two linked piles

enter image description heres

enter image description here

In this proof, the author argues that since $ \Delta_{X/Y} $ is closed and open immersion and $q$ closed immersion, and $\Delta _{X/S} = q\Delta_{X/Y}$, and $(f \times f)^{*} \ \mathcal{I}$ is the $\mathcal{O}_{X \times_{S} X} $- ideal defining the closed immersion q, it follows that

$ \Omega_{X/S} \cong \Delta^{*}_{X/Y} q^{*}( (f \times f)^{*} \ \mathcal{I}/ (f \times f)^{*} \ \mathcal{I}^{2}) $ $(\star)$

But now I can't understand the ($\star$). By the definition, $ \Omega_{X/S} $ is $\Delta _{X/S} ^{*}$ of the sheaf of ideal defining the closed immersion $\Delta _{X/S} $. So, to show the ($\star$), it suffices to show that $(f \times f)^{*} \ \mathcal{I}$ is also $\mathcal{O}_{X \times_{S} X} $ - ideal defining the closed immersion $\Delta _{X/S} = q\Delta_{X/Y}$ .

Is it true?

My first Attempt : First consider the next reduced case :

$ U \overset{i} \hookrightarrow Y \overset{j} \hookrightarrow Z $ , where i is closed open inclusion ( ; i.e, closed open subscheme), and j is closed inclusion, and $ k:= j \circ i : U \hookrightarrow Z $ is closed immersion.

Then now define $ \mathcal{J} := ker(\mathcal{O}_{Z} \overset {j^{b}} \rightarrow j_{*} \mathcal{O}_{Y} ) $ and $ \mathcal{I} := ker(\mathcal{O}_{Z} \overset {k^{b}} \rightarrow k_{*} \mathcal{O}_{Y}|_{U} ) $ ; i.e., the sheaf of ideals defining $j, k$ respectively.

($j^{b}, k^{b} $ are surjective since j, k are closed immersion)

Q. Then $\mathcal{J} = \mathcal{I}$ ?

To show this, fix an open $V \subseteq Z$ . Then since $ k^{b}_{V} = (j \circ i)^{b}_{V} = i^{b}_{j^{-1}(V)} \circ j^{b}_{V}$, $\mathcal{J}(V) \subseteq \mathcal{I}(V)$ . So it remains to show that $\mathcal{I}(V) \subseteq \mathcal{J}(V)$ . Note that if $i^{b}_{j^{-1}(V)}$ is injective, then $\mathcal{J}(V) \subseteq \mathcal{I}(V)$ and we are done.

But I'm stucked on this step. Can we show that $i^{b}_{j^{-1}(V)}$ is injective? If not, can we show $\mathcal{J} = \mathcal{I}$ or the above $(\star)$ by other method?

Further progress : If we can assume that $X,Y,S$ are affine in the original statement in the linked pile, then $X, X \times _{Y} X , X \times _{S} X $ are also affine schemes and we can consider next reduced situation ; $ U:= Spec((A/a)/(b/a)) \overset{\cong} \rightarrow V(b/a) \subseteq Y:= Spec(A/a) \overset{\cong} \rightarrow V(a) \subseteq Z:=Spec(A) $

, where $a$ is an ideal of $A$ and $b$ is an ideal of $A$ containing $a$ and $j : Y : \rightarrow Z$ closed immersion and $ i : U \rightarrow Y$ is closed open immersion, which are induced from $\varphi _{1} : A \rightarrow A/a $ and $ \varphi_{2} : A/a \rightarrow ((A/a)/(b/a)) $ respectively. But even in this simpler case, I am stucked to show that $i^{b}_{j^{-1}(V)}$ is injective when $V$ is and open set in $Z$, even in the case $V=D(f)$ is principal.

Can anyone help me?