If we consider $X$ to be a non-negative random variable, then can we find a lower bound on the left tail probability, that is $\mathbb{P}(X \leq t) \geq C$ where t and C are two positive constants?
2026-04-03 04:56:01.1775192161
Lower bound for left tail probability
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PROBABILITY
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Given is $2$ dimensional random variable $(X,Y)$ with table. Determine the correlation between $X$ and $Y$
- A random point $(a,b)$ is uniformly distributed in a unit square $K=[(u,v):0<u<1,0<v<1]$
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Solution Check. (Probability)
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
Related Questions in PROBABILITY-THEORY
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- What's $P(A_1\cap A_2\cap A_3\cap A_4) $?
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- proving Kochen-Stone lemma...
- Is there a contradiction in coin toss of expected / actual results?
- Sample each point with flipping coin, what is the average?
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Determine the marginal distributions of $(T_1, T_2)$
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
Related Questions in INEQUALITY
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Is every finite descending sequence in [0,1] in convex hull of certain points?
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- How to prove that $\pi^{e^{\pi^e}}<e^{\pi^{e^{\pi}}}$
- Proving a small inequality
Related Questions in UPPER-LOWER-BOUNDS
- Bound for difference between arithmetic and geometric mean
- Show that $\frac{1}{k}-\ln\left(\frac{k+1}{k}\right)$ is bounded by $\frac{1}{k^2}$
- Bounding Probability with Large Variance
- Connectivity of random graphs - proof $\frac{logn}{n}$ is threshold
- Natural log integral inequality
- Spectrum of a matrix after applying an element-wise function (e.g. elementwise log)
- Majorization form for a given set of integers in some interval.
- Proving $(λ^d + (1-λ^d)e^{(d-1)s})^{\frac{1}{1-d}}\leq\sum\limits_{n=0}^\infty\frac1{n!}λ^{\frac{(d^n-1)d}{d-1}+n}s^ne^{-λs}$
- Upper bound for distribution function of the standard normal distribution
- Show $0 < f'(x) \leqslant \frac{1}{2}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is an extremely broad question, and has trivial answers (e.g. take $t>0$ large enough that $C:=\mathbb P(X\le t)>0$). I'm going to interpret your question in the following way:
This is a natural question, since if you reverse the inequalities you get Markov's inequality for $C=\frac{m}t$. (If you ask for higher moments instead of $\mathbb E[X]$, clearly we also have tighter bounds such as Chebyshev or Chernoff; more control of the tails obviously gives you more control in the inequality. I'm going to stick to the first moment.) In fact, as BGM points out in the comments, this immediately gives you $$\mathbb P(X\le t)\ge1-\frac{m}t.$$ However, this is not very interesting - we are interested in "tail" probabilities after all, and so it makes sense to restrict to the case where $t\le m$ (in which case the above bound is useless).
Unfortunately, it turns out that with such a restriction the answer to the above question is "no". To see this, assume without loss of generality that $m>1$ and let $X_n$ have distribution $$\mathbb P(X_n=m+a_n)=1-a_n,\quad\mathbb P(X_n=m+1)=\frac{a_n(m-1+a_n)}{m+1},\quad\mathbb P(X_n=0)=\frac{a_n}{m+1}$$ where we assume $1>a_n\to0$. Then $\mathbb E[X_n]=m$ and, for any $t\le m$, $\mathbb P(X\le t)=\frac{a_n}{m+1}\to0$ as $n\to\infty$, so there is no uniform lower bound.
You can probably use similar tricks for the analogous question where $C$ can depend on the second moment or even higher, I haven't checked this.