\begin{cases} \max & 2x_1 &{}+x_2\\ & sx_1 &{}+tx_2&\le-1\\ & x_1,x_2&&\ge 0 \end{cases}
Find out when this program is not feasible, bounded
Feasibility
It is not feasible when $s\ge0$ and $t\le0$
Because
- $\Rightarrow $if $s<0$ then $\forall M\ge \frac{-1}{s}: x_1=M,x_2=0$ is feasible.
$\Leftarrow $if $t>0$ then $\forall M\ge \frac{1}{t}: x_1=M,x_2=0$ is feasible.
I think the second line of the demonstration is inaccurate. Why should the teacher used a $\Leftarrow$? This is not demonstrating the reverse, isn't it?
Unbounded
The program is unbounded if $s<0$ or $t>0$
$\Rightarrow$
- if $s<0$ then $\forall M\ge \frac{-1}{s}, x_1=M, x_2 =0$ is feasible
- if $t>0$ then $\forall M\ge \frac{1}{t}, x_1=M, x_2 =0$ is feasible
I don't know why the teacher wrote that, indeed we aren't looking for feasibility.
$\Leftarrow$
$2x_1+x_2\le \mu(sx_1-tx_2)\le-\mu$
$\exists \mu >0$, if
- $\mu\times s\ge 2$
- $-\mu\times t \ge 1$
Therfore the program is bounded for $\mu =\max\{\frac{2}{s};\frac{-1}{t}\}$
I don't understand this part of the demonstration, where does $2x_1+x_2\le \mu(sx_1-tx_2)\le-\mu$ comes from?
Optimal?
According to my teacher, it has an optimal solution when ($s<0$ or $t>0$) and ($s\ge0$ and $t\le0$), I understand it as when it is unbounded and not feasible, which I found rather strange. Shouldn't a program with an optimal solution be bounded and feasible?
Nevertheless I understand that given the fact that it is bounded when we don't have ($s<0$ or $t>0$) and feasible when we don't have ($s\ge0$ and $t\le0$), it should never have solution.
Can you help me provide a readable solution?
After two weeks, I tried again to solve this problem:
First part of the bounded demonstration
if:
$$(s<0 \mbox{ or } t>0)$$
Second part of the bounded demonstration
The problem is bounded if $2x_1+x_2\le \mu(sx_1-tx_2)\le-\mu$
$\exists \mu >0$, if
Therfore the program is bounded for $\mu =\max\{\frac{2}{s};\frac{-1}{t}\}$