I would like to Maximise the function $\log\left(1+\sum_i a_i x_i\right) + \sum_i \log x_i$ subject to the constraint $\sum_i x_i = 1$, where $a_i > 0$ and $x_i>0$. My first hunch was to define the Lagrangian $$ L = \log(1+\sum_i a_i x_i) + \sum_i \log x_i + \lambda(\sum_i x_i - 1). $$ Taking the derivative and setting to zero gives $$ \frac{\partial L}{\partial x_i} = \frac{a_i}{1+\sum_j a_j x_j}+\frac{1}{x_i}+\lambda=0. $$ Multiplying through by the product of the denominators, we find $$ 0 = a_i x_i+1+\sum_j a_j x_j + \lambda x_i\left(\sum_j a_j x_j\right). $$ But now I am a bit stuck because the expression couples different $x_i$ and $x_j$. Any idea how to make progress with this?
2026-03-30 15:00:30.1774882830
Maximise $\log\left(1+\sum_i a_i x_i\right) + \sum_i \log x_i$ subject to $\sum_i x_i = 1$
178 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMIZATION
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- optimization with strict inequality of variables
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Calculation of distance of a point from a curve
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- What does it mean to dualize a constraint in the context of Lagrangian relaxation?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Building the model for a Linear Programming Problem
- Maximize the function
- Transform LMI problem into different SDP form
Related Questions in LAGRANGE-MULTIPLIER
- How to maximize function $\sum_{i=1}^{\omega}\max(0, \log(x_i))$ under the constraint that $\sum_{i=1}^{\omega}x_i = S$
- Extrema of multivalued function with constraint
- simple optimization with inequality restrictions
- Using a Lagrange multiplier to handle an inequality constraint
- Deriving the gradient of the Augmented Lagrangian dual
- Lagrange multiplier for the Stokes equations
- How do we determine whether we are getting the minimum value or the maximum value of a function using lagrange...
- Find the points that are closest and farthest from $(0,0)$ on the curve $3x^2-2xy+2y^2=5$
- Generalized Lagrange Multiplier Theorem.
- Lagrangian multipliers with inequality constraints
Related Questions in CONSTRAINTS
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- Find all local maxima and minima of $x^2+y^2$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2y=6$. Does $x^2+y^2$ have a global max/min on the same constraint?
- Constrained eigenvalue problem
- Constrained optimization where the choice is a function over an interval
- MILP constraints with truth table
- Convexify this optimization problem with one nonlinear (bilinear) constraint
- Second-order cone constraints
- Matching position and rotation of moving target.
- Existence of global minimum $f(x,y,z) = x + y + z$ under the constraint $x^2+xy+2y^2-z=1$
- Constrained Optimization: Lagrange Multipliers
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $S=\sum_{j} a_j x_j$. Starting from $$\frac{a_i}{1+S} + \frac{1}{x_i}+\lambda=0, $$ one gets $$a_ix_i + (1+S)(1 +\lambda x_i)=0. $$ Summating on $i$ yields $$S + (1+S)(n+\lambda)=0, $$ i.e. $$S=-\frac{n+\lambda}{1+n+\lambda}, $$ where $n$ is the number of variables. Now starting again from the beginning we get $$x_i(a_i + \lambda(1+S))+1+S=0, $$ so $$x_i=-\frac{1+S}{a_i+\lambda(1+S)}, $$ and summating on $i$ gives you a condition on $\lambda$ : $$1=-\sum_i \frac{1}{\lambda+(1+n+\lambda)a_i}. $$ Such a $\lambda$ exists and is unique in the interval $(-(n+1),-n)$. Though i do not know if there is a nice way to express $\lambda$ as a function of the parameters $a_i$. Then plug in $\lambda$ in the expressions to find $S$ and $x_i$. I hope this is correct.